Opinion

The change Nigerians want

3 Mins read

Chigozie Effe writes on the daunting task ahead of the President-elect as Nigerians look forward to the dividends of their support to the retired General turned civilian president.


On  May 29, Nigeria’s   political history will witness an epochal phase with the  transition in power from an  incumbent President  Goodluck Jonathan to an opposition flagbearer, retired Major General Muhammadu Buhari.

General Buhari, like Abraham Lincoln of the United States of America, has not had it so smooth clinching the exalted position of  number one citizen of the country,  having failed three times consecutively. Undoubtedly, the 73- year old has won the war against all odds,  and now he is faced with the challenge of wining the peace especially now that the elections are over.

Most important, however, this not a time for witch hunting opponents or engaging in politics of calumny by the APC government that is gradually witnessing a huge influx of defectors,  rather it’s a time to consolidate on victory and hit the ground running with people-oriented policies.

This is why the President-elect  must be very careful with those defecting  as most of them are political liabilities or at best  opportunists.

The reformed Nigerian who is committed to  removing the cloak of the military, Buhari, in his acceptance speech, noted that  “this is a moment that we must begin to heal the wounds and work toward a better future. We do this first by extending a hand of friendship and conciliation across the political divides. We hope and pray our friends in the other parties reciprocate.”

With over 50 deaths recorded in the last elections across the country, unifying the country against ethnic divide should be Buhari’s major focus. It would be recalled that never in the history of Nigeria as the country ever witnessed over heating of the polity like the just concluded elections.
More importantly is the fact that Nigerians yearn for security like a  breath of fresh air. It now behooves on the president-elect, as contained in his campaign promises, to ensure that insurgency in the country becomes a thing of the past. This is where his competence as an ex-soldier will be put to test and eventually questioned.

Nigeria’s armed forces, once rated among Africa’s best with distinction in peacekeeping operations around the globe, has become the  butt of jokes over its handling of the Boko Haram insurgency.

The citizens’ confidence in the ability of the government to meet its obligations is at an all time low largely due to massive corruption and the fall of the price of crude oil which has remained Nigeria’s economic mainstay. The president must begin to think outside the  box on how Nigeria’s economy can be diversified.

The widening gap between the rich and the poor is one which the new administration cannot afford to ignore.

Granted that the Katsina-born president-elect, was once Head of State, when he ruthlessly used his power to ensure sanity in the country by  using decrees, the gap toothed ex soldier may not find easy in this present dispensation where democracy holds sway and powers are checked by both Houses of Assembly.

However, General Buhari means different things to different people. To some, he is an incorruptible administrator. To others, he is a controversial figure. Yet to others, he is disciplinarian, who will never tolerate breach of due process.

As an anti-corruption hero, he must declare state of emergency on corruption, having noted that the scourge  has eaten deep into the fabric  of every sector in the country. He must stand his ground and take the country out of the woods.

The already battered economy, as it were, would be another area of concern for the incoming government. The APC- led government must learn lessons  from the outgoing government by ensuring that technocrats  head this important sector so as to give a boost. For example the exchange of dollar to Naira is put at 211 at the moment and this  is unhealthy for the country.

As a former Chairman of  the PTF under Abacha regime, one expects that the coming of Buhari would be bring a  change in the sector, especially now that corruption seems to be the order of the day.

As  president in waiting, the issue of power has become a constant nightmare for citizens in the country. Since the return of democracy 16 years ago, the country has had no stable power supply, signaling that Buhari must apply the magic wand to ensure power remains  stable.

The fall in the standard of education in the country as could be testified in the 2013, 2014 and  2015 WASSCE clearly exposes  the moribund state of the education sector, which has further heightened the high level of crime in the society.

With over forty million youths jobless, Buhari, in other to win the hearts of the youths, must be ready to tackle unemployment headlong so as to reduce criminality and  poverty. This is the change Nigerians need and the time to act is now!

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a general interest Magazine with its headquarters in Abuja, the nation’s Capital.
Articles
Related posts
Cover StoryDevelopmentOpinion

Pedestrian Bridges: Rising Symbols of Renewed Hope in Abuja

2 Mins read
  By Ogefila Bayo Adewale Every morning, parents watch their children leave for school along Abuja highways, their hearts race each time…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Abuja FileCover StoryOpinionPerspectivePolitics

Tinubu’s Reforms Deserve Continuity, Second Term Crucial — Onuigbo

4 Mins read
The President of Globe Legislators International, Rt. Hon. Sir Sam Onuigbo, has called on members and stakeholders of the All Progressives Congress…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com