OpinionPerspective

The Silent Screamed in Kogi State

By
4 Mins read
0
Share

 

By Rev. Fr. Sebastian Sanni

I woke up 12am today for say my prayer as usual and my prayer point today was to pray for the State and I asked God to intervene because of the plights of the people. I discovered that half way the prayer, tears started coming down from my eyes because I tried to feel the pains of the dispossessed and the most vulnerable in the State and those who cannot carter for their families and themselves. I manage to finish the prayer and decided to put down this piece.

Since the inception of this government, Kogi State has been making headline for the wrong reason. We don’t want to talk about the unprecedented judicial process and conundrum that midwived the emergence of Yahaya Bello. We accepted him as our fate and some were so excited that finally, a youth has emerged as a governor. When he came, we expected him to take the State to the next level but your guess of what the present government has done is as good as mine.

Never has it been seen in the history of Kogi State that a leader has been so hardened to the followers. When you sit down to listen to the plights of workers, you will understand what I’m saying. Many cannot feed their families, cannot pay hospital bills, cannot pay the school fees of their children yet we see the State officials living in great affluence in the midst of poverty, hunger and misery. There were two cases of suicide in the State and if I may ask; what is the fate of those families left behind?

The leadership cataclysm witnessed in this present government is unprecedented in the country. The State has been militarised and many voices have been silenced but this post will bring those voices back to life. I want to draw the attention of the world to Kogi State. Kogi State has lost her leadership compass and what we see today is the triumph of mediocrity in the State. The people live in perpetual pain and agony and have to beg for their just wages.

 

 

What crime have they committed not to be paid? As they are begging to be paid now, 2019 may be the turn of the government to beg them to vote them. I write to echo the silent scream of the vulnerable and those that have been denied their just wages. It is evil to deny someone his or her just wages.

Like the people of God in Egypt who cried to God (Ex 2:24). Pharaoh pretended not to hear their cry but God did and sent Moses to rescue His people. Kogi must be rescued from the hands of these political herdsmen.

Since the inception of this government, Bello has succeeded in building opprobrium monuments in the State. The State at the moment is in a cataleptic trance and the State has become a global dustbin of confusion. Personally, I feel the present government lacks the political hygiene to transform the State. The current government in Kogi personifies what true democracy is not. We have so many fissiparous agents in this government.

Kogi State over the years have not been blessed with good leaders but the coming of Yahaya Bello has made things worst. Moving the leadership Barton from Prince Audu of Blessed memory to Yahaya Bello is not a logical progression. When it comes to leadership in the world, there is no paragon of perfection but I must say that in Kogi State as it stands at the moment we have the youngest and the worst governor in Nigeria based on current rating.

 

The State has cascaded since the inception of this government and the ubiquity of social media propaganda that we see cannot in any way redeem the image of this government. Somebody should be bold to tell this government that they have failed.

 

A government that cannot care for the masses and listen to them and be sensitive to their plight is a monumental failure. As long as this government remains in power in Kogi State, the living will always envies the dead.


Recommendations

As a matter of urgency, Kogi State should be “politically quarantined” to get rid of bad leadership.

Secondly, the elders, elite and the religious leaders who have not eaten “Jacob’s porridge” should rise and echo the voices of the suffering masses and condemn injustice, arrogance of power and gross incompetence.

I pity the youths who cannot look beyond the hunger of the moment and fight for their future. It is better you are hungry now and get a better future than to fill your stomach now and mortgage your future.

In conclusion, the silent scream of the oppressed in the State, even though the State government may pretend not to hear, God has heard and the poor and oppressed are very precious to Him and when God begins to act on their behalf, there will be no hidding place…

As people of hope, we continue to pray for good leaders in Kogi State. A leader that will be sensitive to the plight of the people and most importantly, a God fearing leader. As far as Yahaya Bello is concern, with due respect to his office as the governor, he is incompetent and there is no cure for incompetence. I have this final word for the masses, when they come to you with bags of rice and money, collect them and eat but when is time to vote, follow your conscience. If you vote based on rice given you, then you shall continue to scream secretly….
God bless you

#A new Kogi is possible…
#Rescue Kogi now…

 

   

0
Share

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

By
6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Abuja FileCover StoryOpinionPerspectivePolitics

Tinubu’s Reforms Deserve Continuity, Second Term Crucial — Onuigbo

By
4 Mins read
The President of Globe Legislators International, Rt. Hon. Sir Sam Onuigbo, has called on members and stakeholders of the All Progressives Congress…
Cover StoryHealthOpinionPerspective

Nigeria’s AMR Blind Spot: We Cannot Defeat Resistance Without Knowing Its True Scale

By
2 Mins read
  By Pharm. Mercy Aransiola Here is an uncomfortable truth about antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Nigeria: we do not fully know how…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com