Abuja FileAll The NewsNewsReligion

Drug Abuse: Build Strong, Religious Children, Not Broken Men, Ipinmisho Tells Muslim Faithful

5 Mins read

 

By Abdul Rahman Aliagan

 

Muslims all over the country have been advised to build a very strong and religious children rather than repairing broken men. This was a ‘take-home’ message at the  Special Ramadan lecture organised by Nasirul-Lahi-Li-Fatih Society of Nigeria (NASFAT) Abuja branch, Sunday, titled: The Menace of Drug Abuse: The Islamic Solutions, delivered by Barrister Sulaiman Lanre Ipinmisho, a former Director General, National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) at NASFAT Islamic  Centre Abuja.

 

Bar. Ipinmihso who started his lecture by giving an introduction to what is Drug Abuse, According to him, “Drug Abuse is an extreme desire to obtain and use increasing amounts of one or more drug or substances without medical justification, he pointed out that drug abuse has become a common affliction in the country, costing an incalculable toll on every segment of the society, The consistent and sustained abuse of drug is what ultimately leads to addiction.”.

 

The Drug Law expert noted that addiction of various types have grown into enormous social problem that are threatening not only individual and families but the entire society. He maintained that addiction is the scourge of the human civilisation, saying that the urgent need to eradicate them is more critical now than ever.

 

Stressing the need for protecting human dignity, the former Director General of NDLEA said five categories of things must be seriously taking care of. According to him, “Religion, human mind, human body, wealth and human dignity, saying that anything that affects the soundness of the aforementioned are forbidden.”

 

To him, human mind is not only to be maintained in sound condition but is to be nourished, sharpened and more developed by feeding it with knowledge, he emphasised the importance of knowledge saying seeking knowledge is the greatest virtue in Islam. “Any practice that that would reduce the capacity of human mind is strictly forbidden and even punished by law, such as drinking of alcohol and other harmful drugs.”

 

Quoting from the Glorious Quran 5:90: “Intoxicants, gambling and stone and divination by arrows are abomination of satanic seduction. Eschew such”. The Drug Law expert stated further that, Allah said in Quran 45: 13: “it is on account of the human sound mind that Almighty Allah has made all that is in heaven and all that is on earth subservient to man.”

 

In a side interview with Time Nigeria, Bar. Ipinmisho said that people abuse drug on an account of its availability, he added that the agencies that are saddle with the responsibility of making sure that those drugs are not available have to work more on their mandate to ensure they are not available. He added that broken homes are also serving as another cause of drug abuse, he enjoins parents to go back a pick up their responsibilities. He emphasised the need for fathers as the head of family to buckle up and take control of their respective families’ affairs, he said that fathers should not unleash criminals from homes into society.

 

According to the speaker, “Every armed robber comes from a home and every hired assassin comes from a home. Why should criminals be what your family is contributing into Nigerian society? He quarried.  He advised parents to be a celebrated family rather than be a family that contributes anguish and pains to the society.

 

He relates a story of a Nigerian family in United Kingdom where everybody in the family is a Chartered Accountant, he said, “That is a proud family that everybody would want to associate and identify with and not a family of an armed robber.”

 

He tasks government to live up to the billings to safeguard society. He said: “Governments need to understand more and this is very critical. All the government sleepless night as President, Governors, and Ministers and so on is on nothing but human content.”

 

Ipinmisho advised government to pay more attention to human content. “For instance government is building roads, who are the people to make use of the roads? If government should give the same attention that was given to ebola to all other teething issues in the country, may be things would have improved drastically. Government should pay more attention to the fight against drug abuse.”   He said.

 

Proffering solution to the menace of drug abuse in Nigerian society, Ipinmisho said that there are no societal ills that Islam does not proffer solution. He said: “A Muslim is both personally responsible to God and part of wider Muslim community. He stressed the need for Muslims to contribute to the life of society, he added that people derive their identity from such attitude.

 

He encourages Muslims that community members’ support should not only be confined to their immediate family, but extends to wider community. He said, “The most beloved to God are those who are caring towards God’s creation”.

 

He urged Ummah to revitalise religious values and bring these values in to lives, saying that the fear of God can prevent this social menace.

 

Ipinmisho said, drug abuse can be tackled Islamically, he highlighted self-preservation, blessing of Islamic prohibitions, prayers and fasting as a means of strengthening the souls, education as well as rehabilitation.

 

According to him, “In overcoming drug abuse and addiction, one is required to shun heedlessness and fell remorse for having allowed one’s soul to be controlled by one’s lower desires.

 

“For others who, although self-aware to some extent do succumb momentarily to evil inciting soul, the remembrance of the Divine and His commandments are often sufficient to restore the balance and quickly exit the state of heedlessness.”

 

He said: “Islam recognises the perils of such self-destructive behaviours. While prescribing permissible ways of fulfilling certain legitimate desires, Islam clearly draws the line around certain types of behavious and strikes them at the root. Consequently, alcohol, drug consumption, and gambling are strictly prohibited, even in small quantity.”

 

He further stated that, “When one reflects on the havoc caused by alcohol and drug abuse and addiction, and other vices, one can only see the prohibitions and injections of Islam as a great blessings to human race. The divine prohibitions ensure that even if one does not sees wisdom behind abstinent from these evils, one is guarded by adhering to certain norms in a spiritual frame of reference.”

 

The legal practitioner and Drug Law expert said, to bring to an end the scourge of drug abuse and addiction, he said, a holistic view of the human soul is essential. He added that: “Islam provides both a world–view and spiritual system that elevates the human being by empowering soul to fulfil the divine mission.”

 

In his remarks, the Chairman NASFAT branch Dr Nasir Raji appealed to parents to be watchful of their wards right from home to school and every other place they go. He said parents should pay unscheduled visits to their children in both secondary schools and higher institution so as to know the type friends they are keeping. He appreciated the lecturer and acknowledged that he did justice to the topic. He concluded.

 

 

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com