Abuja FileAll The NewsOpinionPerspectivePolitics

Myth, Reality and Lessons From Saraki’s Fall

6 Mins read

By Kayode Abdulazeez

It is no longer a news that, the sitting Senate President, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki who has been tipped as a potential president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria due to his political articulation, network and sagacity to achieve whatever he sets his eyes on and his political progression in the country that eventually made him number three citizen.

No doubt, Saraki is an intelligent person and a goal setter and getter. It would be recalled from a story published by The Watch Magazine in the late 2002 when he was eyeing governorship seat of Kwara State. The publication narrated how Bukola jettisoned a Medical profession for real estate business and how he was doing fine in that business with his ability to take risk by exploiting every opportunity towards recouping his investments which eventually made him one of the youngest millionaires then.

Although, he came into Kwara politics with the support of his late father, Dr Olusola Saraki who was enjoying support of downtrodden in the state, considering his generosity and humility. But we can never dismiss the economic intelligence and exposure of Bukola Saraki which made some elites that were not in support of late Olushola Saraki dominance in the state’s politics to embrace junior Saraki and support him to become governor in 2003 general elections.

Saraki’s legacy as governor of Kwara State from 2003 to 2011 and his influence amongst his colleague when as the chairman Governors’ Forum made him popular at national and international sphere. Some Kwarans are still proud of his performance till today. His achievements as governor include establishment of Kwara State University, Shonga farm, International Aviation College, Kwara Diagnostic Center and implementation of some other infrastructural development like Post Office Flyover Bridge among many others.

Saraki was seen as new political Professor in the state by those who worked with him at various positions while others perceive him as someone they need to keep impressing if they want to continue government patronage both at the state and national.

This eventually gave chance to sycophants to penetrate his blood as he began acting like tin god. Unconsciously he tripped for the sycophants and made it his way of selecting those he commits political responsibility to without given attention to consequences. Nobody dare tell the ‘almighty leader’ the truth; therefore stop telling him the reality of what is going on in town and state generally. This made the 55years old politician lost touch with the electorates as they only feed him with sweet information that far from what is happening on the street. Since they see it as best way to make him happy and get monetary as well as political gain in returns.

His downfalls started when he forcefully emerged president of the senate against interest of the political party, All Progressives Congress (APC) he rode on to become senator again in 2015. This according to political observers led to his persecution by led-Buhari government he worked for it emergence against all odds.

Apart from that, reliable sources accused Saraki of using Kwara State resources to fund his three years legal battle at Code of Conduct Tribunal colliding with the governor he singlehandedly installed.

The residents started feeling the side effects, especially civil servants, public office holders, contractors, students, and general masses suffers negative effect of non-payment of salaries allegedly diverted to fund his CCT trial in hiring SAN’s and mobilizing people from Kwara for solidarity support for Bukola any time the case comes up in Abuja.

State Civil servants started experiencing percentage in salary payment, political appointees began to experiencing cut pays, with no money to balance contractors that have completed their work or award new major contracts, no more bursary for indigene of state schooling in and outside, and low inflow of money in the state to boost economy and patronage of those doing small scale businesses.

Enlightenment of the masses and majorly civil servants by main opposition party through different radio programs led to uncovering of lapses and corrupt tendency of APC turned PDP led government in the state.

The above and other factors unveils the ‘veil’in masses eyes in the state and when the opposition party, All progressives Congress (APC) came up with the one of the most embraced political slogan O to ge ( ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ) they did not stress themselves much before getting the nods of the masses and suddenly it became an anthem anywhere you go in the state and outside to even presidency.

Gang up of Elites in the state also contributed immensely to fall of Saraki political dynasty. Many educated indigenes of the state were never happy with the way Saraki was controlling the government affairs and how he boasts around that kwara political party is ‘Saraki party’ and as such he is the only person that can determine who gets what in terms of appointment in state and federal. To the extent that anybody that need political and non-political appointments or Government patronage must know him or get a letter of recognition from him in which the elitists see as a big shame on their intelligence which must come to an end.

According to one of the top politicians in the state said that Saraki was never in the good book of majority Kwarans and as result most of the previous elections he won for himself and his stooges were always rigged with the support of federal ‘might’ through security forces. And this can be easily confirmed by outcome of last Saturday election.

Bukola got his calculation wrong by leaving APC to PDP due to what people see as personal ambition to retain senate president seat which he believes it may not be possible if he returns to senate under APC. He took this action without paying much attention to federal might he used to ride on in all previous elections. Saraki was said to have went into bargaining for senate president seat with PDP. Which he confirmed by himself in one of his campaign that “PDP has agreed to make him senate president when they win next presidential election and Kwarans should support vote for PDP based on this” but unknowingly to him many of his supporters and political observers in the state see his action of taking them away from APC as personal interest. It was expected that Bukola should be smart enough and endure whatever persecution he would have been passing through in APC, since no condition is permanent and consider consequences of leaving government at the center.

Election reality, the 2019 National Assembly election that eventually resulted into what looks like the end of Bukola Saraki Political reign in kwara was protest votes against what electorates see as unpleasant style of Bukola politics which has major influence in their life’s. especially civil servants which have strong influence in downward trend.

Furthermore, many people are not happy with the level of infrastructural decay in the state and never stop saying the truth to the hearing of those in government but as a winning politician he believed that he would be able to buy conscience of electorates and electoral umpire with money any time election comes up. But this was met with a waterloo.

The beneficiaries of Bukola’s fall that are now the new emergents in Kwara politics should see this as a big task and opportunity to right Saraki’s wrongs. Which it is believed that only time will tell how far they will go politically compared to 16 years of Bukola reign in the state.

Senator-elect Dr Ibrahim Oloriegbe for Kwara Central and other elected federal lawmakers should not see their emergence as a result of their political popularity or capacity but count themselves lucky ones that contested when all forces were tired of Bukola Saraki political reign that people perceived to be causing retrogression in all ramifications in the state. They should capitalise on this uncommon opportunity to write their names with golden pen.

The lessons of his downfall are, with level of political awareness and easy access to real and fake information through social media, any politician that want to continue dominate the game must be ready to be transparent to the people and do the biddings of majority.

Politicians should never undermine the power of masses in waging war against perceived enemy of progress. Political mandate belongs to the masses and masses are ready to support any politician that are transparent to them and ready to give them basic needs of life to make them comfortable and going about their daily activities without hindrance from government policy.

Politicians should be careful not to be carried away with unnecessary praise-singing coming from people around them especially, the sycophants, who only ready to say what pleases them and not the reality on ground..

Physical achievements and good policy that would make life meaningful to the people is the key to political sustainability of any politician that want history to remember him or her for good.

Abdulazeez writes from Ilorin the Kwara State capital

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Abuja FileAll The NewsCover StoryEducationEntrepreneurshipFeaturesNews

2026/2027 Admission Begins @ AAT University: Where Modern Facilities, Academic Excellence and Global Citizenship Meet

7 Mins read
Why Abdulrasaq Abubakar Toyin University is emerging as a compelling destination for the next generation of Nigerian undergraduates By Abdulrahman Aliagan For…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com