All The NewsEducationPerspective

Covid-19 Pandemic: Governor AbdulRahman and His Critical Interventions in Kwara Education Sector

By
6 Mins read
0
Share

By Kamaldeen Aliagan

The outbreak of COVID-19 has caused globally pandemonium, as of 30th of January, 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the pandemic as a global health emergency and the development has thrown Medical scientists, researchers and educationists into sleepless nights to devising ways of mitigating the negative effects of the global health crisis in all sectors of lives.

The easy spread of this virus made people to wear a mask as precautionary measures, introduction of total lockdown, use gloves and hand sanitizer on a daily basis that resulted in paradigm shift in people’s way of life globally.

Traditionally, we have seen that for every event that affects our lives, there are several unintended consequences. Over the past few months, the world has grasped with the impact of Covid-19. Primarily, a health-related issue, its impact is far-reaching and one area which has been significantly affected is education. All over the world, schools have been forced to close, and Nigeria is not left out.

In Kwara State, prior to outbreak of the pandemic, there have been ongoing education reforms that geared towards addressing educational imbalances at ensuring that children everywhere are giving chance to live, to be good and productive citizens, useful to themselves and society in general.

This is an all-inclusive education system embarked upon by the His Excellency; Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq-led administration to ensure access to quality and sound education for all students by effectively meeting their diverse needs in a responsive way. It is about how we develop and design our schools, classrooms, and programs so that all students can learn and participate in learning effectively.

Of course, can we estimate how much the Covid-19 pandemic has affected education? Are the estimated 46 million students that were forced to stay at home in Nigeria still learning? With the uncertainty regarding how long the shutdown will last, there have been several interventions by government and nongovernmental organisations to ensure that students are still learning.

Renovation, Rehabilitation and Preparing Schools for Resumption

In line with the global trends, apart from the comprehensive renovation of eight Secondary Schools and rehabilitation of block of classrooms in twenty-five schools across the three Senatorial Districts in the state, the present administration has also introduced a “Mass Media Class” for senior secondary school students in the state to mitigate the effect of the closure of schools due to the Corona Virus pandemic.

By this programme, students preparing for WAEC and NECO examinations can sit back at home and watch or listen to lessons by the teachers on Television and Radio stations as scheduled. The programme is designed in such a way that the resourceful teachers on different subjects brought on Radio to teach SS3. The radio and television classes were designed in such a way that students will be allowed to call for questions and clarifications. The opportunity to continue their learning on visual and audio in order to meet up with the syllabus has greatly increased their confidence for preparation of the WAEC Exams that is going on now and other that is coming up soon.

While the State government was preparing to unveil the second episode of “Mass Media Class” in continuation of syllabus for both basic classes and exit classes (JSS3 and SS3) students, the Federal government announced the official reopening of schools for exit classes. Although, reopening of schools does not mean the end of Covid -19 but rather to allow certificate classes to write WAEC, NECO, BECE, etc, examinations and also prepare them for future purposes. The federal government announced August 3rd, 2020 as the official date resumption of schools.

In conformity with the directive of Federal government to reopen schools, the Honourable commissioner for Education and Human Capital Development announced 5th August as the official resumption of SS3 class while JSS3 resumed on 17th August, 2020. 

Prior to the announcement of reopening of schools, the Ministry of Education and Human Capital Development has directed all the Principals in the state to prepare for the resumption of their students by tiding the school environment,  fumigation and the arrangement of classes in accordance with the guidelines of NCDC and Federal Ministry of Education.

Flattening the Curve

As a part of the Governor Abdulrahman Abdulrazaq-led administration’s efforts to flatten the curve of Covid-19 transmission, the state made  Sixty-five thousand face masks, fifty thousand 200ml hand sanitizers and two thousand 1 liter of Hand sanitizers available for free distribution to schools in the states.

During the official presentation of protective kits to Ministry of Education by the Deputy Governor, the Chairman of Covid-19 team in the state, Mr. Kayode Alabi, enjoined the Ministry to make sure that the protective kits reach all the certificate students that is going to resume for continuation of their syllabus and preparation for forthcoming examinations.

According to him, “the nose masks and sanitizers are to be distributed to both Junior Secondary school students and Senior Secondary students across the state.  He further said, government will not leave any stone unturned in the fight against Covid-19 pandemic and urged the school authorities to comply with various Covid-19 protocols to stay safe”.

The Honourable commissioner for Education and Human Capital Development, Hajia Fatimah Bisola Ahmed swiftly swung into actions to distribute the protective kits to All Nigeria Confederation of Principals of Secondary Schools (ANCOPSS). During the distribution to Principals, she informed them that the provision of protective kits to teachers and students will afford you the opportunity to have hitch free examination and prevent t you from contracting Covid-19 virus.

Hajia Ahmed also engaged on the sensitization of students and teachers in some schools visited on the need to maintain Physical distance. She implored them to make sure that there is strict compliance with safety guides of NCDC and Federal Ministry of Education in schools.

Honourable Commissioner emphasized that, monitoring teams from the Ministry and its agencies will be going round for monitoring and inspection of the level of Covid-19 safety guide compliance. Any principal or school authority that is endangering the life of our students will be sanctioned accordingly.

“Government will not take any excuses that are going to jeopardize its efforts in eradicating transmission of Covid-19 but rather punish anybody that violates the guidelines”.

This gesture by the government on provision of protective kits to both teachers and students was highly commended by the Presidents, All Nigeria Confederation of Principals of Secondary Schools, Alhaji Toyin Abdullahi. He therefore assured the government of even distribution to all schools in the state and also monitoring the usage.

Quality Assurance and Fight against Examination Malpractices

The prompt action in provision of protective kits to students and monitoring of safety guide compliance by state government was also applauded by the State Director of Quality Assurance Bureau, Federal Ministry of Education, Mrs. Orukotan Lydia.  

In her remarks, “I commended the state government under the leadership of His Excellency, Mallam AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq for provision of protective kits to schools and the prompt actions in monitoring the compliance in schools across the state”.

She however called stakeholders to support the present administration in its efforts at taming the spread of Covid-19 in Kwara State.

On the issue of examination malpractices, the state government has reiterated its determination to eradicate examination malpractices in the state. This was disclosed by the state Commissioner for Education during emergency meeting with all Principals and Private School Owners in Ilorin recently.

“Let me use this medium to warn you that the State Government will not hesitate to deal with any Principal or School  found wanting on his duties during ongoing WAEC examination. Government will not fold its arms to allow what happened last year to repeat itself. Over thirty million penalties paid following WAEC’s blacklists of 165 Schools over rampant examination malpractices are still afresh in our memory” she said.

Hajia Ahmed revealed that apart from swapping of principals to different schools, there will be secret invigilators and intelligent officers in order to ensure compliance. She further said, in addition to this, anti-corruption Agencies will be moving round to arrest and prosecute anybody that is aiding and abetting examination malpractices or involved in any form of sharp practices around the school premises.

She urged the school authorities and parents to encourage students to prepare very well for the examinations and abide by the rules and regulations that guide the examination rather than look forward to a system that aids and abets cheating.

In her words, “you should all go back and hand down my warning to invigilators, parents and students, if any amount has been paid for such examination malpractice services, you should return it before it is too late. There will be no clemency for anybody found wanting in this regard”.

In his remark, the Chairman Teaching Service Commission, Alhaji Abubakar Bello appreciated His Excellency, Mallam AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq for his laudable achievements in the Education sector within less than two years in office.

He warned stakeholders in the education sector not to sabotage the efforts of the present administration rather to join hands with the government to eradicate examination malpractices in the state.

In his contribution, the president, Kwara State chapter of All Nigerian Confederation of Principals of Secondary Schools, Alhaji Toyin Abdullahi stressed their readiness to complement efforts of the present administration in making sure that examination malpractices is a thing of the past in Kwara State.

He stressed that now that Principals are not going to supervise or invigilate in their respective schools, any Principal found culpable in malpractices should be ready to face the music alone.

Also speaking is President, National Association of Proprietors of Private Schools (NAPPS), Dr. AbdulRahman Adetunji assured the state government that what happened last year on examination malpractices will not repeat itself.

He further said the Association Taskforce on examination has engaged Civil Defense to assist them in curbing malpractices in the state.

Aliagan is the Press Secretary at the Ministry of Education, Human and Capital Development, Ilorin, Kwara State

   

0
Share

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The News

My Imminent Handshake with Bukola Saraki

By
7 Mins read
  By: Shehu Bashir Esq. For the first time in my entire life, I am considering shaking hands with Senator Bukola Saraki…
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

By
1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

By
6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com