Opinion

Osun APC And The Rigging Allegation

5 Mins read

In the current situation, even if the former Deputy Speaker should have his way, there’s already a residue; and it is what becomes of the people’s psyche about the ruling party being a rigging party. In simple terms, even if his governorship issue is settled, the fact remains that Aspirant Lasun is from a rigging party. It is not so much about Mr Gboyega Oyetola rigging him out, or Omo-Agege being compensated for supervising the rigging. No! Not at all! Instead, it is about the fact that APC will have to deal with the institutional damage dangerously presented by the Honourable’s weighty allegation, and applying sanctions as appropriate. This shouldn’t be one of those cases that are wittingly swept under the carpet. If there is an iota of truth in Lasun’s allegations, the public will be interested in it.


By abiodun KOMOLAFE 

(Published in Independent, December 8, 2021)

There are times when silence may not be golden. Let’s get something clear: an allegation as grave as the one recently made by Yusuf Sulaimon Lasun, the immediate past Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, is one that deserves all the attention it can get. 
Addressing the media in Abuja, Lasun had accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), of rigging him out of the 2018 Osun Governorship Primary through “a serious, well-orchestrated and coordinated” gang-up. The former Honourable Member representing Irepodun/Olorunda/Osogbo/Orolu Federal Constituency of Osun State also alleged that Ovie Omo- Agege was compensated with the Deputy Senate President position for presiding over the nebulous exercise. 

To start with, political party formation and structure can be likened to a man casting his net into the sea to catch fish. Of course, the fish to be caught by the net are to come in their kinds. Since the net is not discriminatory, it catches all manners of species of fish that will swim in the direction and spread perimeter of the net in the sea. In like manner, political parties are made up of mixed multitudes. However, the stronger the Constitution of a political party, the more it reflects the party’s character. In other words, if the Constitution of the party is weak, and lacks legitimacy, so shall every individual attempt to impose his or her freewill on the party! Suffice it to say therefore that the possibility of such a political party to gravitate toward a party of strongmen, with strong opinions, but with no checks or overriding control, is high. 

That said, the first fear is that APC will have to work on the internal dynamics of its Constitution to rein in everybody who pleasures himself/herself in behaving contrary to the grundnorm and essence of the soul of the party. This step becomes necessary for there’s no explanation, or, justification for Lasun’s offensive outburst against his party, unless, of course, the politician is not aware that political parties are institutions that require certain procedural protocols to deal or interact with them. Even if there are conflicts or knotty internal issues, there should be copious mechanisms in place to deal with them within the party. 

In the current situation, even if the former Deputy Speaker should have his way, there’s already a residue; and it is what becomes of the people’s psyche about the ruling party being a rigging party. In simple terms, even if his governorship issue is settled, the fact remains that Aspirant Lasun is from a rigging party. It is not so much about Mr Gboyega Oyetola rigging him out, or Omo-Agege being compensated for supervising the rigging. No! Not at all! Instead, it is about the fact that APC will have to deal with the institutional damage dangerously presented by the Honourable’s weighty allegation, and applying sanctions as appropriate. This shouldn’t be one of those cases that are wittingly swept under the carpet. If there is an iota of truth in Lasun’s allegations, the public will be interested in it. 

‘Pares cum paribus/Pares cum paribus facillime congregantur’ (A man is known by the friends he keeps). It is sad that, at 61, Nigeria is like a chess game. Like a bird, looking for where to perch, everybody is looking for where a situation benefits him/her the most. People mask their personal interests under the guise of group interests. Ultimately, those interests accrue to personal pockets. The late Emeka Ojukwu understood this much, and particularly voiced his distaste for it before he eventually went his own way. 

Sad also that, in this society, the ‘character profile’ of a person has been relegated to the background. Why did I say so? When you belong to an Association, the character of that Association is what the people look out for. For instance, if Lasun belongs to APC, and APC is a rigging party, then, Lasun is a rigger. It is as simple as that! Therefore, for him to now start acting like a saint is not only unacceptable to good conscience but also tells the world who the former Honourable Member, really, is! In any case, tongues are already wagging, that this man went to represent nobody but Lasun Yusuf in the Federal House. His sojourn for a few years ‘fetched’ him the best hotel in Osogbo, the State Capital. Rumour even has it that the lawmaker has another one in Ikeja-Lagos. For God’s sake, isn’t this the same man who would rather pollute the entire river than for him not to have a particular fish from it? Is Lasun not trying to bring the house down just to have his personal interest protected? So, who is fooling who? 

If one may ask: is the matter on hand not yet another in the series of ‘ajegbodo to n wa eni kunra’ (the guilty one, who is always looking for an accomplice) against Rauf Aregbesola as the former governor of Osun? Without being immodest, Lasun’s allegation has also impugned Ogbeni’s reputation, as the former Deputy Speaker was indirectly saying that Aregbesola oversaw the rigging. And, that’s a serious accusation! 

In all of these, Governor Oyetola deserves commendation for his ‘sidon look’ approach in the face of needless provocation by an erring member of his party. He deserves a pat on the back for neither taking the law into his hand nor abusing his power as the incumbent Governor of Osun State. Were he to be of the tribe of aggressive leaders elsewhere, he most probably would have responded; and that would have spoilt the broth for the institutions that are trying to put the issue at stake in check. 

Talking seriously, Lasun’s allegation should also serve as a lesson in season, especially, for those who are currently applauding him for bringing his party into disrepute. Yes, it’s one thing to start singing ‘Hosanna’ simply because the former lawmaker has done something that’s “marvellous in” their “eyes.” However, Nigerians must equally weigh the future implications of his disruptive and selfish actions, especially, in making future political calculations and decisions. 

All said, Aspirant Lasun should still be allowed to contest future elections in the ruling party, if he’s interested. After all, Nigeria is a democracy; and one of the essential attributes of a democracy is the ability to vote and be voted for. In other words, the politician should not be denied his right to contest on account of the rigging allegation. But then, providence demands that he does it, not in a way that will rubbish the entire system. Well, Nigerians may not see it now; but what the former lawmaker is trying to do is to spoil the entire foundation upon which the electoral system is built. Except we are being economical with the truth, what he did amounted to an insult on democratic norms and values; and this transcends party affiliations. The more reason something must give, either to rectify the situation, or, modify it. Otherwise, it will always be a metaphor for the barber’s chair: motion without movement! 

May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria! 

*Komolafe wrote in from Ijebu-Jesa, Osun State (ijebujesa@yahoo.co.uk; 07087941459)

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
Cover StoryDevelopmentOpinion

Pedestrian Bridges: Rising Symbols of Renewed Hope in Abuja

2 Mins read
  By Ogefila Bayo Adewale Every morning, parents watch their children leave for school along Abuja highways, their hearts race each time…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Abuja FileCover StoryOpinionPerspectivePolitics

Tinubu’s Reforms Deserve Continuity, Second Term Crucial — Onuigbo

4 Mins read
The President of Globe Legislators International, Rt. Hon. Sir Sam Onuigbo, has called on members and stakeholders of the All Progressives Congress…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com