All The NewsOpinionPolitics

APC National Convention: What Really will Kwara Gain with Saliu Mustapha as Chairman?

4 Mins read

We saw it happen when the immediate former Senate President, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, was aspiring for the number four seat in the leadership hierarchy in Nigeria. On the day of the election on the floor of the Senate, the whole of Kwara jettisoned their partisan and other differences to queue behind their son. We saw Kwarans of all walks of life praying fervently for Saraki, even ordinary and everyday people on the street. And when the election eventually went in Saraki’s favour, a huge carnival-like atmosphere engulfed the whole of Kwara, especially the state capital, Ilorin. There were dancing and jubilations across major streets, with motorcycle riders displaying stunts in celebration of what they described at the time as “Kwara occupying the number four seat.” At the time, the quest for the position was no longer a Saraki ambition; instead it was about the patriotism of an average Kwaran to see the state having a place of pride in the politics of the country

By Abubakar Teslim

Except for a short stint in acting capacity in the then ruling party, PDP, Kwara, through history, has not led a major political party in Nigeria. But with Mallam Saliu Mustapha, the Turaki of Ilorin, in the frontline for the APC National Chairmanship in the impending convention of the party, a significant milestone is about to be attained in the annals of political elevation for Kwara State and her people.

As a state that borders both the north and south, with a rich combination of diverse ethnicity, mixed culture and languages, Kwara is an important sub-national entity in the political geography of Nigeria. As a state with a proud origin, indigenes of Kwara State are known for their audacity and front-row participation in the politics and governance of the country, even during the military era. It is this recognition of Kwara’s place in national politics, and the need to safeguard it, that often serves as a unifying force that pulls everyone together whenever a son or daughter of the state is in contest for any position.

We saw it happen when the immediate former Senate President, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki, was aspiring for the number four seat in the leadership hierarchy in Nigeria. On the day of the election on the floor of the Senate, the whole of Kwara jettisoned their partisan and other differences to queue behind their son. We saw Kwarans of all walks of life praying fervently for Saraki, even ordinary and everyday people on the street. And when the election eventually went in Saraki’s favour, a huge carnival-like atmosphere engulfed the whole of Kwara, especially the state capital, Ilorin. There were dancing and jubilations across major streets, with motorcycle riders displaying stunts in celebration of what they described at the time as “Kwara occupying the number four seat.” At the time, the quest for the position was no longer a Saraki ambition; instead it was about the patriotism of an average Kwaran to see the state having a place of pride in the politics of the country.

In this current dispensation, Kwara’s most significant position may yet be the national chairmanship of the APC should Saliu Mustapha get it. And this is why, like it happened during Saraki’s campaign for the Senate Presidency, many in the state today are taking Mustapha’s ambition as a personal aspiration, burying party or any other sentiments to rally support for and around him.

Today, Ilorin, which is the ancestral homestead of candidate Mustapha, has been practically painted red because of the ambition of an illustrous son of the soil. From streets to streets, taxi cabs to tricycles, and other strategic locations in the state, the mood of the people of Kwara state is all clear to the blind and audible to the deaf.

Considering the antecedents of Saliu Mustapha, both as an individual, community stakeholder and politician, I am confident that Kwarans are not backing up the wrong tree with their absolute support towards his emergence as the next national Chairman of the ruling All Progressives Congress.

To begin with, it is said that what you prioritize defines your life; Saliu Mustapha himself has proven beyond any shred of doubt that he prioritizes all matters connected to Ilorin and Kwara. And there is no better proof of that than the honour bestowed on him recently as the Turaki of Ilorin Emirate in recognition of his commitment to the growth and development of his place of birth. Therefore, when Mustapha occupies such a critical position as that of national chairman of a ruling party, it should go without saying that his numerous community interventions would now receive even a major boost.

With expected increase in political connections and network which would come about as a result of his position, Kwara State stands a chance of benefiting extensively from the investment that political associates would seek to make in the home state of the party chairman; a gesture that would no doubt impact on the lives of individual citizens of the state, some of whom already are beneficiaries of the large-heartedness and generosity of Mustapha.

Of course, there is also a huge political advantage that would accrue to the ruling APC in the state. With a national chairman from the state, Kwara would become almost impenetrable for any opposition, a situation that would guarantee the continuity of the present government and also attract federal presence in terms of projects and appointments. It is no surprise that the incumbent Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, the calculative maverick that he is, sees the prospect early enough, as he’s reported to be backing the ambition strong and solid.

Securing the APC national chairmanship position would inevitably return Kwara State to the national political limelight, following the hiatus occasioned by the loss of the Senate Presidency.

By and large, Saliu Mustapha, considering his fanatical interest in Kwara’s growth and his contributions to the development of communities and individuals would no doubt create greater opportunity to advance the interest of the state as a party chairman. If he has done exceedingly well in his personal capacity, providing support to persons and assisting the less privileged, it is only a matter of common sense to expect that his elevation to the position of a national chairman of a ruling party would only serve to deepen the opportunities available to him to do even greater good to a greater number of our people.

As it’s customary for us in Kwara, with our penchant for supporting our own and by extension the state’s interest, Saliu Mustapha’s aspiration again demands our harmonized resolve and collective support. Like Jean Vanier said, ‘one of the marvelous things about community’ is that it enables us to do things we couldn’t do as individuals. Now is the time to combine our individual strengths and communal spirit in support of one of our very best, Mallam Saliu Mustapha (Turaki).

,Teslim, a public affairs analyst, can be reached on abuteslim@gmail.com

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Abuja FileAll The NewsCover StoryEducationEntrepreneurshipFeaturesNews

2026/2027 Admission Begins @ AAT University: Where Modern Facilities, Academic Excellence and Global Citizenship Meet

7 Mins read
Why Abdulrasaq Abubakar Toyin University is emerging as a compelling destination for the next generation of Nigerian undergraduates By Abdulrahman Aliagan For…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com