OpinionPolitics

Bolaji Abdullahi: Towards Effective Legislation and Representation in Kwara Central

5 Mins read

 

By Comrade Gesua Yekini

One of the major factors that determine growth and development in every democratic government is the quality and the commitment of the representatives elected to coordinate the political affairs of the electorate.

In Nigeria today, weakness in the representative capacity of the legislature threatens democratic advancement, unlike most advanced countries where democratic government is the driving force to growth and development. Quality representation is always a significant factor on which the electorate take seriously in assessing those seeking political offices.

The consequences of this lack of true representation are not merely symbolic. A legislature’s main responsibilities are representation, lawmaking and oversight. None of these can be done effectively if the interests and identities of the country are not reflected in those who represent and make decisions on their behalf.

The need for quality representation that will lead to a better living for the people of Kwara Central Federal Constituency cannot be undermined. Mall Bolaji Abdullahi (Omoluabi) represents the dawn of a new order, he can be counted among the few sons of Emirate who can give quality representation with positive results. He understands why he has to serve his Constituency better for the peace, progress and prosperity of the nation in general

Our politics need to evolve beyond choosing candidates based on ethnicity, sentiments, material things, religion etc, but choosing candidates based on their qualification, antecedent, manifesto and policy direction and what they plan to do in office. Citizens need to consider what constitutes their topmost needs and choose the candidate whose agenda provides solutions to those needs.

In recent elections, politicians have resorted to buying votes from poor citizens for as low as N500 and in some desperate cases N10,000 or more in order to gather votes. This has led to more voter apathy and an increased lack of commitment of governments to improving the lives of citizens. If this act is not nipped in the bud, a responsible government answerable to the people may never emerge.

There is need for Nigerians to shun vote buying and selling and rather vote responsible people into government who will deliver dividends of democracy. The people at the grassroots level must be educated on the values of their votes as well as the values they should vote for at the coming polls.

We are tired of poverty and are really searching for ways to end the status quo. We must understand that only our votes for the right candidates can lead Nigeria to a place of prosperity, and give us the ability to seek accountability from elected representatives.

The level of poverty in the land has made a lot of people believe that you have to share something before they could listen to you or the message you are trying to communicate. Our advocacy now must more centred around voting for the best candidate that could make education, health, commonwealth and well being of the people a priority.

Alas, the evil consequences of selling votes are tantamount to selling our future and the future of our kids. All those things we admire in life will remain daydreams if we don’t vote for the credible candidates who would ensure good governance in return.

The candidate of People’s Democratic Party (PDP) for the Kwara Central Federal Constituency in the 2023 general elections, Mall Bolaji Ganiyu Abdullahi if given the opportunity, development will be even across the constituency as he intends to be very vocal in advocating government presence in Kwara Central. Serving the people in terms of life-changing moves and engaging in sustainable projects that will see to the growth and development of the constituency will be his cardinal objective.

Records has shown that Omoluabi was one of the vibrant and outspoken Kwarans who has utilized every opportunity that he has been given to serve to the best of his ability. In his personal capacity, he has also dedicated the resources that it has pleased the Almighty Allah to give him to serve those who are less privileged around him and in his community.

In his career spanning almost two decades and several positions at both public and private sector, he served with courage and integrity. He has not been found wanting.

While he was special Assistant Communication and Strategy, between 2003 and 2005, he was responsible for overall media strategy of the Governor. Chairman, Budget Implementation and Management, Committee, responsible for overseeing implementation of budget priorities and ensuring value for money in government expenditure as Special Adviser Policy and Strategy between 2005 and 2007.

Bolaji Abdullahi, a public administrator per excellency while serving as Commissioner for Education in the state launched and implemented ‘Every Child Count’, hailed as the most comprehensive education reform programme in Nigeria. He attracted great support from international development partners, including the World Bank and the DFID, Education Sector Support Programme in Nigeria (ESSPIN).

Under a continuing teacher improvement strategy, he trained and retrained over 20,000 teachers across the state with full allowances and established the Quality Assurance Bureau that introduced support-based monitoring of teaching in schools, among many others he achieved as Commissioner in the Ministry of Education.

Serving at the Federal level as Minister of Youth Development and Sports, Omoluabi Carried out the reform of the National Youth Service Corps for the first time since its creation in 1976 and launched the You-Win, youth entrepreneurship promotion initiative in collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of ICT that awarded grants of up to N10million naira to each winner across the country.

He also convened the first Nigeria National Sports Summit in 2012. He won the Africa Cup of Nations with the Super Eagles of Nigeria after 19 years and won the Under 17 World Cup for Nigeria for the 4th time. Won the African Athletics Championship in all categories, including the reformation of the Nigeria Professional Football League (NPFL) by establishing the League Management Company (LMC) and signed broadcast right agreement with Super Sports worth 4million USD.

His philanthropic interventions includes Founding of the Omoluabi Foundation, a social intervention initiative focused primarily in using extra-curricular activities for youth development in Kwara State.

He has supported several artisans with equipment and start-up funds for their business. Awarded full scholarship to 5 youths at the Kwara State University, Malete and paid registration fees for hundreds of youths for UME, WAEC and NECO.

Omoluabi Built and renovated classrooms in selected community/public schools in the State. Bult literacy and numeracy laboratory in Barakat LSMB primary schools, and provided furniture and writing materials to all the pupils. Likewise, he sank motorized boreholes with full reticulation in his Community

Bolaji Abdullahi’s Community Participation and Interventions includes Financial contribution to the renovation and maintenance of llorin Central Mosque and also served as secretary of the llorin Central Mosque Financial Sustainability Committee.

Supported the completion of mosques and procurement of power generators and public address systems to several mosques. Supported the activities of the llorin Emirate Descendants
Progressive Union (IEDPU), including convening a special interactive session of Emirate indigines in Abuja with the national executives of the union under the leadership of Ambassador, Sheikh Usman Abdul-Azeez.

He also supported the activities of the llorin Emirate Youth Development Association and the Annual Durbar events since inception.

To the people of Kwara Central Senatorial District, this is the time to vote for value and diligent candidate. For us to move forward, we must elect among us a credible representative that understands the very nature of constituency challenges and how to address them.

It’s time we raise the bar of our expectations from our representatives. Our demands should be nothing short of global standards of development.

Comrade Gesua Yekini is a former Chairman, Radio, Television, Theatre, Arts Workers Union (RATTAWU), Kwara State Chapter,

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Abuja FileCover StoryOpinionPerspectivePolitics

Tinubu’s Reforms Deserve Continuity, Second Term Crucial — Onuigbo

4 Mins read
The President of Globe Legislators International, Rt. Hon. Sir Sam Onuigbo, has called on members and stakeholders of the All Progressives Congress…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com