Cover StoryDevelopmentEconomyEntrepreneurshipFinancePerspectiveProfile

2024 Int’l Coop Day: How MedLab Practitioners Multipurpose Cooperative Society Set to Transform Nigeria’s Socio-Economic Landscape

4 Mins read

Take the case of MLPMCSL for instance. This cooperative, which is made up of predominantly Medical Lab practitioners, average-income earners, has been using its collective savings and loan scheme to help its members start and expand their businesses, as well as to weather economic shocks and personal emergencies.

By Abdulrahman Aliagan

In the bustling heart of Africa, Nigeria, the Africa’s commercial hub, a group of Medical Laboratory Practitioners came together to form what is today known and called Medical Laboratory Practitioners Multipurpose Cooperative Society Limited (MLPMCSL). This group of people huddles around a table, both in the days and in the nights to discussing the latest ways, ideas and innovations of making savings and loan working for the best for its members.

This is not a typical business meeting, but rather a gathering of Medics and non-medics alike, as one of the thousands of cooperative groups that are quietly revolutionizing the socio-economic fabric of Africa’s most populous nation.

Without a doubt, cooperative societies have long been the unsung heroes of Nigeria’s development story. These member-owned and democratically controlled organizations have been providing vital financial services, empowering entrepreneurs, and fostering community resilience in ways that formal financial institutions have often failed to do.

Instructively, “MLPMCSL within its shortest time of existence, it has been a lifeline for members” says, Mr Kingsley Okpala, the Secretary of MLPMCSL FCT Branch and Chairman, MEDLAB Estate. According to him, “It allows us to save regularly, acquire shares, access loans, when we need them, and support each other through difficult times. Without them, I don’t know how we would manage.”

Indeed, the impact of cooperative societies in Nigeria cannot be overstated. With an estimated of over 10 million members across the country, these organizations are playing a crucial role in promoting financial inclusion, reducing poverty, and driving sustainable economic growth.

“Cooperatives are the backbone of Nigeria’s informal sector,” explains Dr. Adesoji Adelaja, a professor of public policy at Michigan State University who has studied the cooperative movement in the country.

“They provide access to credit, business training, and other essential services that are often out of reach for the country’s marginalized communities.”

Take the case of MLPMCSL for instance. This cooperative, which is made up of predominantly Medical Lab practitioners, average-income earners, has been using its collective savings and loan scheme to help its members start and expand their businesses, as well as to weather economic shocks and personal emergencies.

“Through the cooperative, we’re able to access small loans at affordable interest rates,” says Abubakar. “This has allowed us to invest in our businesses, send our children to school, and even at the verge of owning to ourselves new homes, the initiatives that has brought about MEDLAB Estate, a project that is going to set a standard for cooperative societies in Nigeria. It’s a game-changer for us.”

The transformative power of cooperative societies is not limited to the informal sector, however. Across Nigeria, from rural farming communities to urban professional circles, these organizations are driving innovation and social change.

For example, a cooperative of Medicals has been using its collective bargaining power to negotiate better prices for their crops, as well as to access improved agricultural inputs and technologies, affordable Housing and food interventions to cushioning the Nigeria’s present economic reality. This, in turn, has led to increased productivity, higher incomes, and greater food security as well as enabling members to fund their professional development and personal aspirations.

“Cooperatives are truly the unsung heroes of Nigeria’s development story, “Say Mr John Chidi, a Medical Lab practitioner, “They are empowering individuals, strengthening communities, and contributing to the overall socio-economic growth of the country in ways that are often overlooked.”

As Nigeria grapples with the challenges of youth unemployment, economic inequality, and social fragmentation, the cooperative movement offers a glimmer of hope. By fostering a culture of self-help, mutual aid, and democratic participation, these organizations are demonstrating the power of collective action to drive positive change.

“Cooperative societies are not just about money and business,” reflects Maryam Abubakar. “They are about building a better future for all of us – one that is more inclusive, resilient, and just. And that, to me, is the true significance of what we do.”

Meanwhile, on Saturday, the 6th of July, 2024, MLPMCSL has highlighted programmes to join the global community to commemorate the International Cooperative Day under the theme “Cooperatives Build a Better Future for All.” This significant event, spearheaded by respected figures such as Alhaji Idris Ali Sanni, emphasized the critical role that cooperative societies play in empowering members and driving economic progress.

At the heart of the event is a focus on innovative excellence and the empowerment of members to achieve economic leadership through unity and performance. Muhammed S. Bello, the esteemed Founder/CEO of the Cooperative & Labour Education Research Centre (CLERC) in Lagos, will deliver a compelling address as the Guest Speaker, that will emphasizing the need for cooperative unity in fostering growth and development.

The energetic Elder IO Benjamin, the Project Manager/President of the MLPMCSL will serve as the Chief Host and Co-Speaker to the upcoming event, it is going to shed light on the enduring and endearing nature of cooperative societies and the pivotal roles playing by both members and management in nurturing a thriving cooperative environment.

Guiding the proceedings are experienced moderators Mr. Abdullahi Abdullahi Samaila and Uba Cornelius Ekenedilichukwu, who would ensure a smooth flow of discussions and engagements throughout of the event.

As part of the programme schedules, attendees are therefore invited to join this global event, at 8:30 pm via Google Meet. The event promises to be an enlightening and enriching experience that will showcasing the collective efforts towards advancing socioeconomic growth and development through cooperative initiatives.

In conclusion, the International Cooperative Day 2024 celebration is going to serve as a testament to the vital role that cooperative societies is playing in building a better future for all. Through unity, innovation, and a commitment to excellence, these cooperative entities continue to drive positive change and transformation in communities, ultimately shaping a brighter tomorrow for generations to come. Let us all heed the call to embrace the cooperative spirit and make every day count towards a more inclusive and prosperous society.

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com