All The NewsCover StoryEconomyFeaturesNewsReligion

Empowering the Vulnerable: Ashraaf Islamic Foundation’s Drive for Food Security and Economic Growth

4 Mins read

The widows will be trained and empowered. When you train somebody, you are directly empowering them. So, we’re going to train and empower widows. We’ll empower Almajiris. We are going to train and empower as much as possible. We are going to train and empower people with disabilities and young unemployed Nigerians. We pray that Allah will make this happen more than the way we expected.

           — Imam Aliagan

Cross-session of Peoples with Special Needs (PWDS) to benefit from Ashraaf Islamic Foundation’s Smart Farming training project

By Abdulrahman Aliagan, Abuja

In a world where food insecurity remains a pressing challenge, organizations like the Ashraaf Islamic Foundation are making tangible efforts to address the issue through empowerment and strategic advocacy. On Saturday, March 15, 2025, the Foundation hosted its 8th Annual Ramadan Lecture (1446AH) and Special Prayers for the Nation in Abuja, focusing on the theme: “Ramadan Lessons on Food Security: Building Nigeria’s Path to Sustainable Economic Growth and National Development.”

The event, a five-in-one gathering, combined a Ramadan lecture, national prayers, empowerment programs, training sessions, and an exhibition aimed at addressing food security while uplifting widows, persons with disabilities (PWDs), unemployed youth, and the Almajiri community.

The Founder and Chairman of the Foundation, Imam (Dr.) Sharafudeen Abdulsalam Aliagan, emphasized that empowerment is more than just financial aid; it is about providing people with the means to sustain themselves.

“We are going to empower four categories of people in this hall today,” Aliagan announced.

“The widows will be trained and empowered. When you train somebody, you are directly empowering them. So, we’re going to train and empower widows. We’ll empower Almajiris. We are going to train and empower as much as possible. We are going to train and empower people with disabilities and young unemployed Nigerians. We pray that Allah will make this happen more than the way we expected.”

Aliagan reiterated that self-reliance is key to reducing poverty and food insecurity, urging Nigerians to embrace modern agricultural practices, particularly smart agriculture, to ensure sustainable food production.

The Chairman of the occasion, Malam Lanre Issa-Onilu, the Director-General of the National Orientation Agency (NOA), represented by Deputy Director Audu Ayuba Mayo, underscored the importance of food security in national development.

“Food security is not just an economic or agricultural concern; it is a fundamental aspect of national development and social stability. A well-nourished society is a productive one, and ensuring access to affordable, nutritious food is essential for national growth and peace,” he stated.

He called on government agencies, religious institutions, private organizations, and individuals to contribute toward ensuring food sufficiency by supporting local farmers, reducing food waste, and adopting responsible consumption habits.

The NOA, according to Issa-Onilu, remains committed to mobilizing Nigerians towards behavioral change and policies that protect the most vulnerable.

“As we reflect during this holy month, let us renew our commitment to building a nation where no one is left behind,” he concluded.

Representing the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun, CSP Faruk U. Dange called for youth engagement in agriculture to prevent crime and idleness.

“An idle mind is the devil’s workshop. If the youth are engaged in productive activities like agriculture, they will have no time for crime. We must involve them in food production while also ensuring their safety,” he said.

Dange encouraged Nigerians to collaborate with security agencies by providing timely information to combat crime, adding that prayers and moral support for officers working to maintain law and order were also necessary.

A retired director of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Dr. Oyeleke Rasaq, emphasized the need for Nigerians to grow their own food, citing small-scale agricultural initiatives such as snail farming as viable ways to enhance food security without significant financial investment.

Aliagan reinforced this sentiment, noting that even small agricultural efforts can collectively have a significant impact on food security:

“The solution is for each and every one of us to learn how to farm on our own without serious capital. You can do farming in your respective homes. You can do what we call snail farming and others,” he advised.

He further appealed to non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private individuals, and the government to invest in agricultural empowerment programs that promote self-reliance and reduce dependency.

Speaking at the event, Senator Saliu Mustapha, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Food Security, represented by Mr. Salman Salman, commended the Foundation for selecting a timely and crucial topic. He stressed the importance of food security, not only during Ramadan but throughout the year.

From (Left) Alhaji Asiwaju Abdulhakeem Bello Oyeleke and Salman Alhaji Salman representative of Senator Saliu Mustapha

“Now that food security has become an issue the world over, it is essential that we put our acts together to ensure that we provide for those who are less privileged,” Mustapha stated.

He echoed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s stance on producing what we eat and eating what we produce, advocating for increased investment in local food production.

As the event progressed, attendees had the opportunity to participate in an ongoing exhibition showcasing agricultural products and innovations. Vendors and farmers engaged in buying and selling activities, reinforcing the importance of practical agricultural engagement in achieving food security.

Dr. Aliagan made an impassioned appeal to wealthy individuals and corporate organizations to contribute to empowering more Nigerians in sustainable agriculture, emphasizing that “the more they give, the more they are expected to give.”

With prayers for national peace, economic prosperity, and food sufficiency, the event ended on a hopeful note, inspiring attendees to take practical steps toward self-reliance and community support.

The Ashraaf Islamic Foundation’s 8th Annual Ramadan Lecture exemplified the essence of Ramadan—compassion, sacrifice, and communal responsibility. However, beyond charity, the Foundation’s approach underscores the importance of empowerment, education, and strategic policy engagement in addressing food insecurity and economic challenges in Nigeria.

As the country grapples with rising food prices, unemployment, and security concerns, initiatives like these serve as a blueprint for a self-sufficient and economically stable Nigeria—one where every individual has the means to feed themselves and contribute meaningfully to society.

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com