AgricultureCover StoryEconomyNews

Envoy, Others Laud Positive Result of First Nigeria’s Cattle Embryo Transfer — Blue Ridge Farms MD

5 Mins read

 

  • Will definitely bring a lot of transformation

From Kehinde Akinpelu, ilorin

Agricultural Attachee to the Brazilian Embassy, Mr. Frederique Rosa E Abreu; International Business Director to Zebuembryo, the Technical Partner to Silagreen International Agro Development Ltd, Mr Humberto Da Rosa; Chief Executive Officer of Silagreen International Agro-Development Limited, Mr Michael Akinruli; Chairman Silagreen Agro, Engr. Dr. Amos Ayodele; Managing Director, Blue Ridge Farm Mr. Kunle Obisesan; Director, Adila Niche Farm, Mr. Solanke Abel, and Managing Director, Divine Living Farms, Mr. Olu Balogun, have said the positive laboratory result of the cattle embryo transfer in Nigeria will improve national food security by fast-tracking massive dairy production.

They spoke in separate interviews with journalists on Tuesday.

Abreu stated that the achievement is the testament to the power of international cooperation, bringing together both public and private sectors in pursuit of sustainable livestock improvement.

He explained that the public officials, the technical team for the ministry of Agriculture and Livestock of both countries worked to reach a mutual understanding which led to the approval of the international certification.

He added that in the private sector, the collaboration between Brazilian biotechnology and the Nigerian agriculture company has been instrumental in making the breakthrough a reality.

He commended the leadership of Nigeria’s Minister of Livestock and Development, Alhaji Idi Mukhtar Maiha, for his commitment to modernize the sector, adding that such has been crucial.

Abreu said: “With this development, there is going to be greater development in terms of livestock production in Nigeria. For instance, the average milk production in Nigeria is about three litres per cow. And there is a lot to improve. So, this is the first step to restart a new industry of milk in Nigeria.”

International Business Director to Zebuembryo, the Technical Partner to Silagreen International Agro Development Ltd, Mr Humberto Da Rosa, said the feat is a very important milestone in Nigeria.
He said: “We made the diagnosis of gestation for the first cows, early Nigerian cows, who had received the first embryos in Nigerian history. Then we transferred embryos from Brazil to Nigerian cows in Harmony Farms in Ogun State. And we achieved a good result with this embryo transfer. And we strongly believe that it will help to change the dairy production in Nigeria with Brazilian breeds, mainly Girolando breeds.

“Girolando is a crossbreeding breed. They are breed donors with Holstein Moose. In Brazil, we have a very good average milk production with this breed. And this breed is more resistant against parasites, and it is more resistant against heat and wet conditions, mainly during the rainy seaso

Rosa who is in charge of international operations in (Zebuembryo) urged Nigerian farmers to adopt the new technology as possible as he stated that it changes the Nigerian model of production.

Chief Executive Officer of Silagreen International Agro-Development Limited, Mr Michael Akinruli, said the novel technology has been a great learning for farmers in Nigerian
He stated that the feat is a very good one and the first time as well as playing the foundational talk of purebred dairy and beef animals in Nigeria.

He said: “We started early and we are already showing results. So, I think it could impact greatly because now farmers as well can produce animals that are purebred, are from dairy line, animals with global record of milk consistency in milk production and beef production, So we can now start seeing our animals as well enjoying the record of animals in the global stage. So it is the beginning as I said, so we still have a long way to go but the beginning is really, really, really promising.”

Chairman Silagreen Agro, Engr. Dr. Amos Ayodele who expressed excitement at the positive outcome of the result as the intention of the company to revolutionize cattle production in Nigeria was becoming a reality as it is.

He said: “Of course, because this is the first of its kind in Nigeria, it has never happened before. Our customers were naturally not very sure, but we were able to sell the technology to them through some knowledge that we known.
“We got them to embrace the idea, and at the end of the day, they also took the risk to come into it, and today is a moment for everybody to be excited. So, we have this sense to actually do this technology, but six farmers embraced this idea first. And honestly, we cannot but recognize their confidence and trust in us to have signed up for this program

For example, we have, in this process, six farmers, most of them are co-sponsored; Kosbaz farm from Ilorin. We have Adila Farm, Harmony Farm and Bluerich Farm from Ogun State, Divine Living and Eagle Crest Farm from Oyo State as well. All these clients of ours actually believed in us when we showed the idea to them.

“And today, we can say it’s a moment of joy, both for us, for them, and also for our country, Nigeria. So, because this kind of thing has never happened before, it’s a landmark for us, and it’s already showing an indication and a direction that Nigeria could go into for cattle production, especially to improve dairy and beef in our country. Let’s get to know, what is the technology you are really talking about that you adopted? The technology adopted is identifying the best animal in terms of animal production.

“So, this will transfer into Nigerian cattle, which means we have the full range, all right, of animals at the end of the day. So, the future of animal production in Nigeria will be determined by the cows that these animals will give birth to, you know, in about six months from now. The Federal government is aware of the positive result. So, before the transfer, the concerned Government authorities were engaged and the due processes complied with. After the transfer, we had a meeting with the Minister of Livestock and the Directorate of Quaternary Exchanges was also aware because they were the one who approved the imposition of the technology.

Managing Director, Blue Ridge Farms, Mr. Kunle Obisesan, said it is great news that such feat could be achieved in Nigeria.

He said: “I think this should be the first project of that type, Nigeria. And it’s a good thing because it’s very important that we embark on things that bring about a genetic status of our cows. And this definitely is going to bring a lot of transformation. I think it’s a good thing. I was happy. The result has not been made known to us officially. But this is just the beginning.

“And I’m very sure that we are going somewhere big in the future. I have also sure that Nigerian dairy farmers will embrace it and of course, it will help in boosting dairy production in the country because if you look at where we are when it comes to dairy production now, it’s quite unfortunate. And over the years, many people have been trying to come in and make their contribution. But because of the process, some of our cows, I think the best you can get from them, could be five litres or four litres. Some may not even give you anything a day.

“And so with this technology, it’s definitely going to bring about a lot of improvement. And I expect a lot of farmers who want to do dairy again.”

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com