Cover StoryCrimeNewsOpinion

Beyond Celebration: How Nigeria @ 65 Must Tackle the Drug Abuse Crisis

By
4 Mins read
0
Share

 

By Omonon Chidi Nwafor

As Nigeria celebrates 65 years of independence, the nation stands at a crossroads between pride and reflection. The tricolour flag once again flutters in commemoration of freedom from colonial rule, but beneath the festivities lies a sobering reality: our independence is incomplete if the menace of drug abuse continues to hold our youth captive and threaten the future of our nation.

Drug abuse has grown into a silent epidemic in Nigeria, cutting across class, gender, and geography. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), over 14 million Nigerians aged between 15 and 64 years have used drugs, with about 3 million already suffering from drug use disorders. This is nearly three times the global average. Far from being a mere statistic, these figures reflect broken homes, shattered communities, wasted potential, and rising insecurity. At 65, a country once full of promise must pause to ask itself: can we truly be free if our future generation is enslaved by addiction?

The NDLEA’s Renewed Fight

Encouragingly, in recent years Nigeria has witnessed a more determined and visible campaign against the drug crisis. The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), under the able leadership of its Chairman, Brig. Gen. Mohamed Buba Marwa (Rtd.), has reinvigorated the fight with strategic focus and purposeful resolve. The agency has intensified crackdowns on traffickers, intercepting tonnes of illicit substances at our borders, airports, and seaports. In addition, innovative awareness campaigns and rehabilitation programmes have expanded to reach schools, marketplaces, and even remote communities.

This progress is not accidental. It reflects the political will and operational discipline being instilled in the NDLEA’s renewed drive. The Chairman’s insistence on professionalism, integrity, and collaboration with international partners has repositioned the agency as a credible force in the war against drugs. Today, seizures are up, prosecutions are swifter, and communities are beginning to feel the impact of these interventions. While the road ahead remains long, there is no doubt that this fresh leadership is yielding results worthy of national commendation.

The Cost of Inaction

Still, the challenge remains daunting. Drug abuse is both a health crisis and a security threat. It fuels criminality, undermines productivity, and worsens poverty. In the North-East, for instance, drug cartels have been linked to the financing of violent extremism, while in cities across the South, addiction is driving spikes in cultism, robbery, and gender-based violence. Economically, the cost of treating drug-related illnesses and the loss of productive man-hours run into billions of naira annually.

At 65, Nigeria cannot afford to continue carrying this burden into the future. Independence must mean more than political sovereignty; it must translate into the freedom of our people from the shackles of drugs, poverty, and despair. The fight against drug abuse is therefore not just about law enforcement—it is about preserving the very soul of our independence.

The Role of Society and the Flag Foundation

Government cannot fight this battle alone. Communities, faith-based institutions, families, and civil society groups must rise to their responsibilities. In this regard, the Flag Foundation of Nigeria has emerged as a critical voice in mobilizing citizens around national values, unity, and civic responsibility. By promoting patriotism and encouraging Nigerians to take pride in the national flag, the Foundation reminds us that true independence is sustained not by symbols alone, but by the daily choices we make as a people.

The Foundation’s ongoing campaigns, particularly among youths, resonate deeply with the anti-drug struggle. Just as the NDLEA is tackling the supply and demand for illicit substances, organizations like the Flag Foundation are helping to rebuild the moral and patriotic compass of the younger generation. Together, they underscore the fact that nation-building is a collective responsibility.

A Call for Holistic Action

As we celebrate Nigeria @ 65, we must move beyond ceremonial parades and speeches. It is time for a holistic strategy against drug abuse. Schools must integrate preventive education into their curricula. Communities must embrace open dialogue, shedding the stigma that prevents addicts from seeking help. Rehabilitation centres should be expanded, adequately funded, and staffed with professionals who can help victims reintegrate into society. Parents and guardians must stay vigilant, nurturing environments that discourage experimentation with harmful substances.

Equally important is the role of the media. At independence, Nigeria’s press was a pillar of democracy and accountability. Today, it must also be a tool for awareness, shaping narratives that discourage drug use and highlight stories of recovery and resilience.

Independence as a Responsibility

The founding fathers who secured our political freedom in 1960 envisioned a nation where every citizen could live with dignity and purpose. At 65, our duty is to secure freedom from internal enemies such as drug abuse, corruption, and insecurity. Independence is not a one-time event; it is an ongoing responsibility. It demands vigilance, sacrifice, and above all, unity of purpose.

This anniversary must therefore serve as both celebration and wake-up call. We cannot dance in the streets while ignoring the chains of addiction that bind millions of our young people. We cannot wave the flag without ensuring that it represents a nation truly free from the grip of drugs.

Looking Ahead

The road to a drug-free Nigeria will not be easy, but it is possible. With strong institutions like the NDLEA under effective leadership, complemented by civic movements such as the Flag Foundation of Nigeria, the seeds of change are already being sown. What remains is the collective will of government, citizens, and communities to water those seeds until they bloom into a safer, healthier, and more prosperous Nigeria.

As we mark 65 years of independence, let us recommit to this vision. Let us honor the sacrifices of our heroes past not just with celebrations, but with action—action that secures the freedom of every Nigerian child from the grip of drugs, and guarantees the promise of a brighter tomorrow.

Omonon, is a Counselor/Recovery Coach and Head of programs at Flag Foundation of Nigeria, she can be reached via: omydel@yahoo.com
07069288295

   

0
Share

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

By
1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

By
6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

By
2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com