Cover StoryOpinionPerspectivePoliticsProfile

Why Modele Sarafa-Yusuf Deserves a Chance in Ogun State                            

4 Mins read

From my experience as a journalist, journalism, especially in Nigeria’s dynamic political environment, is not for the faint-hearted. As a veteran journalist, Modele Sarafa-Yusuf spent decades holding public officials accountable, investigating corruption, amplifying marginalized voices, and interpreting complex policy issues for the public.

— Sunday Oyinloye

By Sunday Oyinloye

In a nation as vibrant, complex, and promising as Nigeria, leadership should never be confined by gender, background, or entrenched political traditions. Unfortunately that is often the case in our country, but is something that must be corrected.

As Modele Sarafa-Yusuf , a female veteran journalist steps forward to contest for governor of Ogun State, seeking to become the first elected woman to hold such office, I believe her candidacy represents more than personal ambition. It symbolises a test of our collective commitment to fairness, competence, and democratic progress.

I rarely defend any politician because politics as practiced in Nigeria is very dirty and you need to be dirty to survive in it. But Modele I know very well. I believe she should be given a chance not because she is a woman, but because her experience, perspective, and courage make her uniquely qualified to serve as a governor in Ogun State.

For decades, Nigerian politics has been dominated by familiar power structures. While women have served in appointed and legislative roles, the executive governorships have remained overwhelmingly male. This is not necessarily a reflection of women’s inability, but rather of structural barriers, limited party support, and societal biases. When a woman with a long and distinguished career in journalism decides to step into the arena, she challenges those barriers directly.

From my experience as a journalist, journalism, especially in Nigeria’s dynamic political environment, is not for the faint-hearted. As a veteran journalist, Modele Sarafa-Yusuf spent decades holding public officials accountable, investigating corruption, amplifying marginalized voices, and interpreting complex policy issues for the public.

Such experience cultivates critical thinking, resilience, and a deep understanding of governance. Unlike career politicians who may have spent years navigating party hierarchies, a journalist has observed the system from both inside and outside. She knows where it fails citizens. She understands the consequences of policy decisions on ordinary people. That insight is invaluable.

Moreover, journalists are trained to listen. Good governance begins with listening—truly listening—to constituents’ needs, fears, and aspirations.

I know some Nigerians might argue that journalism does not automatically translate into executive competence. That is true. However, governance is not a technical skill possessed only by traditional politicians. It requires vision, the ability to assemble competent teams, transparency, and moral courage. Modele Sarafa-Yusuf has these qualities.

As a seasoned journalist, she has built networks across civil society, the private sector, and government institutions. The Modele that I know understands how systems interact. She knows how to communicate clearly and manage public scrutiny. These are critical executive skills.

Besides, her candidacy will send a powerful message to young girls and women across the state and the nation. For too long talented women have been discouraged from pursuing political office due to harassment, financial barriers, and cultural expectations. Supporting her campaign is not about symbolic politics; it is about dismantling outdated assumptions that executive authority belongs exclusively to men.

Elections are about choice. Democracy loses its vitality when viable candidates are dismissed because they do not fit traditional molds. It is my candid opinion that giving Modele Sarafa-Yusuf a fair chance is in the best interest of the people of Ogun State.

Her Early Life

Modele, was born in Ibadan into the family of Alhaji Buhari Osinaike, a public servant in the old Western Region and Ogun State and Alhaja Sifawu Osinaike a textile merchant

Education

Modele Sarafa-Yusuf had her primary and post primary education in Ibadan before proceeding to the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University) where she obtained a Bachelor of Education degree in English in 1986. She later obtained a Master’s degree in Public Administration from the University of Lagos in 2002.

Modele’s Career 

In 1987, Modele was deployed to Oyo state for her National Youth Service. For her primary assignment, she was posted to the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) Ibadan where she quickly mastered the art of television news gathering, processing and presentation; and became the first woman sports caster in Africa. She was not only the first, she distinguished herself thereby becoming an asset to the station; and not surprisingly, she was retained by NTA Ibadan after her service year. Modele was later posted to the NTA headquarters in Lagos where her presentation became synonymous with confidence and excellence. Even though she was primarily a sports caster, Modele Sarafa-Yusuf took on assignments in other areas including business, politics and crime. She was also a columnist in newspapers and magazines; and a scriptwriter for television programs in fields as diverse as culinary and education. For many years on NTA, she radiated confidence and charm which brightened many homes.

Modele Sarafa-Yusuf joined telecommunications company – Globacom in January 2004 as Senior Manager Sponsorships. In the more than seven years she was at Globacom, she helped develop the company’s sponsorship strategy, which led to increased brand awareness and subscriber loyalty; and was credited with helping to build and manage strategic relationships between the company and the media.

Later as Globacom’s Head of Sponsorships (West Africa), she worked with a team of very talented people contributing to projects such as the Glo-CAF Awards. She also led other projects such as The Lagos International Half Marathon, The Glo-Premier League in Nigeria and Ghana, and the first-in-Africa relationship with Manchester United Football Club.

She went on to become Director of Marketing of the American University of Nigeria in 2013 from which position she retired to set up Formart Multi Services Nig. Ltd, Marketing Communications consultants to several blue-chip companies.

For several years, she produced and presented the personality interview program View from the Top on Channels Television (4) .The program ran over several seasons and always featured top decision makers and elites in business, public service, politics, philanthropy, religion and royalty.

The program View from the Top later aired on Arise News Networks for a few more seasons. As Head of Lagos Operations in Arise News, Sarafa-Yusuf helped to transition the former London-based world news channel to an Afrocentric channel with a Nigerian DNA; helped recruit on-air and back-end personnel and worked with anchors, reporters, and producers on ways to make the newscast more appealing. In addition, she coached the anchors on vocal delivery, ad-lib skills, posture, and pacing. Modele continues to contribute to political discussion programs including This Day Live on Arise News

Breaking a historical barrier by electing the first female governor would be significant—but the greater victory would be choosing a leader based on merit and courage. Giving Modele Sarafa-Yusuf a chance will affirm that leadership in Nigeria is open to all who are qualified, committed, and ready to serve.

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com