AgricultureBusinessCover StoryEconomyNews

First Female Innovator Emerges as FMN Prize for Innovation Season 5 Winner

By
5 Mins read
0
Share

“The FMN Prize for Innovation reflects the core of our Business which is the unwavering drive to build sustainable food systems in Nigeria and progressively, in Africa. These SMEs were highly impressive and their products are greatly innovative, you would clearly see the passion and commitment to their business and craft. I am impressed and will continue to support Nigerian SMEs as they are FMN’s partners in food self-sufficiency drive.”

— Chairman, FMN, Mr. John G. Coumantaros

  • Drives Cassava Innovation Through SME Support
  • Company Chairman Doubles Prize Money for Innovators

FMN, a leading diversified Pan-African Food and Agro-allied Group, and the convener of the renowned FMN Prize for Innovation (PFI) initiative has successfully concluded the 5th season of the FMN PFI. And for the first time in 5 years emerged a Female winner of the FMN Prize Money from over 2700 entries garnered for the 5th season of FMN PFI. The live event of the Grand Finale is being aired on FMN TV, GoldMyne TV and Pulse TV YouTube Channels following a live broadcast on Friday, the 15th of May 2026.

The Finale of the 5th season of the FMN PFI, which focused on “Innovative Practices in Cassava Production and Processing” was marked by a significant increase in the Prize Money and Financial support for SMEs. During the concluding event of the FMN PFI the Chairman of FMN, Mr. John G. Coumantaros, and the Season’s Special Guest of Honour, doubled the prize money for the top three finalists.

From an initial Prize of ₦5,000,000 to ₦10,000,000 , ₦3,000,000 to ₦6,000,000 and ₦2,000,000 to ₦4,000,000 for the Winner, first and second Runners-up respectively. The Chairman also rewarded the last two finalists with the sum of ₦1,000,000 (One million Naira) each to further encourage industrial solutions within the cassava value chain.

Following highly competitive pitches from the top five finalists for the season, Kiyoko Foods Ltd founded by Victoria Ogwanighie emerged as the winner of the fifth edition of the FMN Prize for Innovation (PFI 5.0). Kiyoko Foods ltd innovatively turns cassava into nutrient-rich cheese balls called Sorghud Cheese Balls. Sorghud Cheese Balls is a locally-produced snack made from cassava, designed to improve child nutrition while reducing post-harvest losses. By transforming surplus cassava into affordable, high-quality cheese balls, the project creates value for farmers and supports sustainable food systems.

Closely ranking first runner up in the competition is Pneedles Limited owned by Joshua Attat. PNeedle converts cassava peels – an abundant agricultural waste, into sustainable, plant-based leather. By transforming waste into a valuable material, they reduce environmental pollution, supports circular economy practices, and provides an eco-friendly alternative to conventional leather. Bach and Moen Ltd by Valentine Okoli was the second runner-up, a position he clinched through his innovative project of cassava processing hubs that enable smallholder farmers to quickly transform fresh cassava to stored longer shelf life and into high-value food products.

By combining efficient processing technologies with product innovation, Bach and Moen converts cassava into modern convenience foods such as instant Abacha and nutritious cassava-based snacks. The model allows farmers to process their harvest within hours, preventing spoilage while expanding market opportunities.

Kiyoko Foods Ltd founded by Victoria Ogwanighie received ₦10 million (Ten Million Naira) as her Prize Money and other progressive benefits like promotion of brand by FMN, mentorship in the form of advisory to support business growth and scale up. Pneedles Limited by Joshua Attat, was rewarded the sum of ₦6 million (Six Million Naira) for his innovation in converting cassava peels into sustainable, plant-based leather.

The second runner-up, Valentine Okoli of Bach and Moen Ltd, was awarded ₦4 million (Four Million Naira) for developing processing hubs that produce instant Abacha and cassava-based snacks to extend the shelf life of the crop.

Among the high-ranking participants who qualified for the final stage alongside the winners were Amsadaf Ventures by Eng. Sadiq Muhammad who proposed mechanized machine fabrications for smallholder farmers, and Farmavi Agro by Rashidat Ayoola Oluwafemi who developed a liquid bio-fertilizer from toxic cassava effluent. These two finalists were also rewarded with ₦1 million (One Million Naira) each as part of the Chairman’s Special Guest reward package.

In his comment as the Special guest of honour, the Chairman, FMN, Mr. John G. Coumantaros said “The FMN Prize for Innovation reflects the core of our Business which is the unwavering drive to build sustainable food systems in Nigeria and progressively, in Africa. These SMEs were highly impressive and their products are greatly innovative, you would clearly see the passion and commitment to their business and craft. I am impressed and will continue to support Nigerian SMEs as they are FMN’s partners in food self-sufficiency drive.”

Also, the caliber of the winning participants this year; Victoria, Joshua, and Valentine; demonstrates that Nigerian entrepreneurs are ready to move beyond conceptual ideas toward commercial viability.

These innovators are not just winning a prize but are providing real-world solutions like sustainable leather from waste and shelf-stable food products. Our goal is to ensure that through this increased funding and corporate mentorship, these businesses are fully integrated into the wider industrial ecosystem to drive long-term economic growth.”

Reflecting on the success of this year’s edition and the growth of the initiative over the years, Mr. Sadiq Usman, MD, FMN Agro &Director, Strategic Engagement Partnership, FMN Holdings ltd remarked:

“The completion of this fifth edition represents a significant milestone in our five-year journey of strategic investment in local content. With over 2,700 entries this year from both SME and students’ categories, the scale of participation confirms that the PFI has become a vital platform for addressing Nigeria’s industrial gaps. By focusing on cassava, we are addressing a specific structural gap where Nigeria remains a major importer of industrial derivatives despite high local production volumes. The innovations presented this year demonstrate a clear pathway for translating raw agricultural output into high-value industrial materials and food products that strengthen our national food system. We have seen past winners scale their operations significantly, and the fifth season further expands the pipeline of cassava-focused innovations that are relevant to Nigeria’s industrial
needs.”

The Grand Finale selection process was overseen by a panel of experts, including new judges Yewande Kazeem, a marketing specialist and founder of Wandieville, and Farmer Kolawole Adeniji, Chairman of Agro Services Ltd. They served alongside returning judges, including Mr. Sadiq Usman, MD, FMN Agro & Director, Strategic Engagement & Partnership, FMN Holdings ltd and Adenike Adeyemi, Trustee at Youth Business International. These additions were intended to provide deeper market and technical insights into the scalability of the proposed solutions.

Speaking on her pioneering winning as the first female winner of the FMN PFI, Victoria Ogwanighie, founder of Kiyoko Foods Ltd said “I am exceedingly grateful for this experience and support, I am still very much overwhelmed with the reality of being the first female winner since the inception of the initiative.

“I applied for the 5 th season of the FMN Prize for Innovation on the day it was meant to close, so you can imagine my happiness when I was called for the second level screening and further selected as a finalist.

“I know that we have a great product in our Sorghud Cheese Balls and I firmly commit that without an iota of doubt, we will use the prize money effectively and efficiently to scale our business and continue to be of great value for nation and the global community.”

Through the conclusion of the 5th season of the PFI 5.0, the Brand continues to drive agri-enterprise growth, local innovation capacity, and the development of sustainable agricultural value chains in Nigeria. The group remains committed to providing the institutional knowledge and resources necessary for local innovators to succeed at scale while building sustainable food systems.

About FMN
Incorporated on the 29th of September 1960, as a Limited liability company and pioneer wheat miller in Nigeria, Flour Mills of Nigeria (FMN) started out on a journey that has seen the company evolve into what is now one of the biggest brands in the food and agro allied sector in Africa.

The Group has made strategic investments that drive development across its key value chains of Grains, Sugar, Cassava starch, Feeds & Protein, and Edible oil, & fats. For over six decades, FMN has been committed to its purpose of ‘Feeding and Enriching lives, Every Day.

The organization has maintained a rich tradition of enhancing the quality of living for millions of families by producing a wholesome portfolio of food options through the company’s iconic food brand, “Golden Penny’, a household name that is trusted by many for good food and for daily nourishment.

For more information, visit: www.fmnplc.com

   

0
Share

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

By
1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

By
6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

By
2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com