Climate ChangeCover StoryEnvironmentOpinion

Onuigbo Urges United Front Against Climate Change as Nigeria Faces Rising Environmental Risks

4 Mins read

Former member of the House of Representatives and sponsor of Nigeria’s Climate Change Act 2021, Rt. Hon. Sam Onuigbo, has called for stronger collective action on climate governance, warning that climate change now poses a direct threat to Nigeria’s economy, security and national stability.

Onuigbo made the call on Wednesday while delivering a keynote address at the EnviroNews Media Literacy Training on Climate Change Governance, Gender Mainstreaming and the UNFCCC and Minamata Convention held at Hapag Lloyd House in Abuja.

Speaking on the theme, “From Personal Effort to National Action: Reimagining Climate Change Governance in Nigeria,” the former lawmaker said climate change was no longer a distant environmental concern but a lived reality affecting communities across the country.

He said the impact of floods, desertification, drought, coastal erosion and rising temperatures had continued to disrupt livelihoods, destroy infrastructure and worsen insecurity nationwide.

According to him, the shrinking Lake Chad Basin remains one of the clearest examples of ecological degradation and its security implications in Nigeria.

“Communities dependent on the lake for survival experienced displacement, economic collapse, forced migration and social instability,” he said.

Onuigbo noted that competition over diminishing natural resources had contributed significantly to recurring farmer-herder conflicts in several parts of the country.

He said global institutions had increasingly recognised climate change as not only an environmental issue but also a developmental, economic and humanitarian challenge capable of undermining sustainable growth.

Rt. Hon. Sam Onuigbo traced the evolution of global climate governance from the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, stressing that climate action required coordinated efforts from governments, institutions, businesses, civil society and citizens.

He described climate change as “the cumulative result of years of small decisions made without regard for their collective consequences, including deforestation, poor waste management, delayed policies and unsustainable consumption patterns”.

Highlighting Nigeria’s legislative response, Onuigbo recalled that earlier climate bills failed to secure presidential assent before the eventual passage of the Climate Change Act in 2021.

He explained that the law established the National Council on Climate Change chaired by the President and created a framework for emissions reduction, climate financing and sustainable development.

“The Climate Change Act represented Nigeria’s formal institutional acceptance of climate change as a strategic national challenge requiring coordinated governance mechanisms,” he said.

Onuigbo said the Act mandated Ministries, Departments and Agencies to integrate climate action into their operations through dedicated climate change desks.

He added that climate governance must not remain an isolated environmental issue but should be mainstreamed into agriculture, transportation, housing, infrastructure and energy planning.

The former national Assembly member also emphasised the importance of legislative oversight, saying laws alone could not solve the climate crisis without proper implementation and accountability.

Commending recent reforms under the administration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu, he said the removal of fuel subsidy and the implementation of the Electricity Act 2023 demonstrated growing commitment to Nigeria’s climate transition agenda.

According to him, decentralisation of electricity generation would enable states to strengthen renewable energy development and improve energy access.

He further cited ongoing initiatives including sovereign green bonds, compressed natural gas programmes, rural solar electrification and climate-smart agriculture as important steps toward sustainable development.

Onuigbo also stressed the importance of climate financing, noting that the Climate Change Fund established under the Act would support mitigation and adaptation projects across critical sectors.

He said climate action should be viewed not only as an environmental necessity but also as an economic opportunity capable of driving industrialisation, innovation and job creation.

Addressing journalists at the training, Onuigbo described the media as critical partners in climate governance.

“Journalism is the bridge between scientific knowledge and public consciousness,” he said, urging media organisations to invest in climate literacy, investigative reporting and specialised environmental desks.

He also called for stronger participation by women and youths in climate governance, noting that both groups remained disproportionately affected by climate-related disasters despite playing key roles in environmental advocacy and community resilience efforts.

On the Minamata Convention, Onuigbo warned against the dangers of mercury pollution, particularly from artisanal mining activities, saying unsafe mercury use continued to threaten public health and ecosystems.

He urged Nigerian universities and research institutions to generate locally relevant climate data capable of informing policy decisions and adaptation strategies.

Onuigbo urged governments, businesses, civil society organisations and citizens to embrace collective responsibility in confronting climate change.

“Climate action is no longer optional; the future of Nigeria’s development will depend significantly on how successfully it responds to the climate challenge today” he said

Earlier in his opening remarks, Michael Simire, Publisher of EnviroNews Nigeria and Executive Director of Advocacy and Campaigns for Sustainability (Endvocas), described the conference as timely, stressing that climate impacts across Nigeria are becoming more severe and demand informed public engagement.

According to him, journalists play a central role in shaping public understanding of climate change, environmental governance, and sustainability policies.

“Journalists are not just storytellers; they are agenda-setters, watchdogs, educators, and catalysts for change. When the media is empowered with knowledge, context, and clarity, society benefits from better governance, stronger advocacy, and more inclusive decision-making,” he, said.

Simire noted that the training aimed to deepen media understanding of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Minamata Convention on Mercury while strengthening gender-sensitive environmental reporting.

The Publisher emphasised that women and girls remain disproportionately affected by climate change and mercury pollution, yet continue to be underrepresented in environmental policy spaces.

In her keynote address on behalf of the National Network Coordinator of the Climate and Sustainable Development Network (CSDevNet), Doose Joanna Hannu said climate change is no longer a future threat but a present-day crisis affecting livelihoods and vulnerable communities across Africa.

“We are gathered because the future is being written in real time, and the media will decide how that future is understood,” Hannu said.

She stressed that while governments negotiate policies and scientists generate data, the media remains responsible for translating technical climate issues into language the public can understand and act upon.

Also speaking at the event, Founder and Global Lead of the Women Environmental Programme, Priscilla Achakpa, said the role of the media in addressing these challenges cannot be overstated.

She explained that the media serves as a bridge between scientific knowledge, policy discussions, and public understanding.

“As we engage over the next two days, I encourage us all to use this platform to build stronger partnerships, deepen our knowledge, and renew our commitment to environmental justice and sustainable development. Together, we can amplify the voices of those most affected and promote gender-responsive climate solutions,” she said.

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com