Cover StoryOpinionReligion

Is A Quarter of Politicians’ Dedication to Politics Enough for God?

4 Mins read

By Ugochukwu Ugwuanyi

At the drop of a hat, most Nigerians would opt for partisan politics over committing to expressing the things of God. But someone who has not only been in the corridors but also in the parlour of power has revealed which is more beneficial. He didn’t just stop at exposing the most profitable option but has, for want of a better term, defected to it!

If sensitive and attentive in the spirit, you’d realise that God speaks even from the least expected quarters. This is why we can’t discountenance the instructive point made by Abdur-Raheem Adebayo Shittu, Nigeria‘s minister of communications from 2015 to 2019, while announcing his resignation from partisan politics a few days ago. According to the former member of the Oyo State House of Assembly, “If you put even a quarter of the effort we invest in politics into God’s work, one will certainly be better compensated.”

It is immaterial that the ex-minister came to this realisation after being outmanoeuvred in the All Progressives Congress (APC) primaries. In politics, it is said that you either emerge or submerge. Rather than suffer in Siberia, Shittu smartly pivoted to God, rededicating himself to his creed. Christians can learn a thing or two from this, since the subtext of man’s declaration almost conforms with the divine admonition to “seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well.” Matthew 6:33 (NIV).

From Barrister Shittu’s assertion, it can be extrapolated that Christians should strive to be as tenacious in serving the Lord as politicians are with their ambitions. And you know they go all out so much so that for most, it becomes a do-or-die affair. If you can’t appreciate their zeitgeist and passion because they are out of reach, imagine the enthusiasm of their average supporter and party member – the extent they are willing to go in ensuring the victory of their man. This will give you an idea.

It is highly debatable whether “even a quarter of the effort…” is good enough for God. Still, the point seems to corroborate Jesus’s “my yoke is easy, and my burden is light” comment in Matthew 11:30. Shittu’s minimisation of the requirement is understandable because he’s trying to make the point that serving God is comparatively less exerting yet more rewarding than the debilitating game of politics. But God isn’t content with half measures; instead, He prefers persons who will go all out for Him.

Moreover, Jesus declared in Matthew 6:24, “No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.” So whoever is going to be rewarded for Kingdom Service must carry God’s matter “for him head” (as the streets would say) like fanatical supporters of Nigerian politicians or their muscle men. This doesn’t mean being aggressive or violent in the service of the Lord, but going out of your way and laying aside every dissuasion from pursuing the actualisation of God’s will on earth. After all, we are saved to save others!

This is why you should be an active member of a local church. Doing so not only offers several avenues for serving the Lord but also empowers you with what it takes to advance the Kingdom of God on earth. Remember that the arrival of the Holy Spirit – which was to enable early disciples of Jesus to evangelise (Acts 1:8) – happened as they were all together in a room, not while they were in their various homes. (Acts 2:1). Be sure to find one work or the other to do in the house of God, and like Ecclesiastes 9:10 charges, “Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might…” This further reinforces the truth that Christians aren’t expected to give their God a quarter of the effort they expend elsewhere but use all their might in serving Him.

Now, that doesn’t mean they would be found wanting in important areas of life, like career. The truth is that diligently serving the Lord will make the faithful a high-flying professional, provided they give to Ceaser what is Ceaser’s and to God what is God’s. Daniel was overtly committed to Yahweh that he could deny himself choice delicacies from the King’s table to prove the faithfulness of the Lord. (Daniel 1:8, 12, 15).

He never missed praying three times a day, yet the man of God was still able to distinguish himself above his colleagues (Daniel 6:3) and was found to be “ten times better than all the magicians and astrologers” in Nebuchadnezzar’s kingdom. (Daniel 1:20). Scripture cannot be broken; this affirms that diligently serving the Lord and performing well in one’s career are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they complement each other. Employers and hiring managers with reservations about recruiting believers passionate about the things of God don’t know what they are denying their organisations.

The blessings that come with Kingdom Service go beyond the faithful servant to their sources of livelihood and employers! We are sure of this based on Genesis 30:27, where this was spoken about Jacob: “Please listen to me,’ Laban replied. ‘I have become wealthy, for the LORD has blessed me because of you’.” If you consider the supplanter undeserving, what about Joseph, about whom Genesis 39:5 says, “From the day Joseph was put in charge of his master’s household and property, the LORD began to bless Potiphar’s household for Joseph’s sake. All his household affairs ran smoothly, and his crops and livestock flourished.”

If responsible organisations can go to great lengths to ensure the comfort, well-being, and financial stability of their staff, how much more so the Lord Almighty? He can be trusted to be the exceedingly great reward of those in His employ. It’s because God can do better that He declared in Matthew 7:11, “If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him!” Now, that’s generally speaking. If in His service, you wouldn’t have to ask before, “he will give you everything you need.” Matthew 6:33 (NLT).

VIS Ugochukwu is a Sage, Narrative Architect and Branding Strategist who can be reached via: nmiringwu@gmail.com

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com