All The NewsCover StoryEconomyEnvironmentHealthNews

Abuja’s Clean Cooking Revolution: Transforming 12,500 Households, Protecting Mothers and Saving the Environment

5 Mins read

The Mandate Secretary of the Health Services and Environment Secretariat (HSES), Dr. Dolapo Fasawe presenting a voucher for the refill of the Gas Cylinder to one if the beneficiaries at the Grand Finale ceremony at the Bwari Area Council Stadium, Abuja yesterday.

By Abdulrahman Aliagan, 

For decades, the sight of smoke rising from firewood stoves has been a familiar feature across many communities in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). In rural settlements and even parts of the nation’s capital, thousands of families have relied on firewood and charcoal as their primary cooking fuel, unaware that the smoke filling their kitchens silently threatened their health, shortened lives and contributed to environmental degradation.

Today, that narrative is gradually changing. Through an ambitious partnership between the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and IHS Nigeria, under the Project Breathe Clean Air–Abuja, more than 12,500 households across the six Area Councils have begun transitioning from traditional biomass fuels to cleaner and safer Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), marking one of the most significant clean cooking interventions ever undertaken in the nation’s capital.

The initiative reached a historic milestone on Thursday with its grand finale held in Bwari Area Council, where hundreds of beneficiaries received LPG cylinders, burners and refill vouchers, bringing months of community engagement, awareness campaigns and phased distributions to a successful conclusion.

What began in November 2025 as a programme targeting 5,000 households steadily expanded through additional phases until over 12,500 families had benefited across the six Area Councils of Abuja.

More Than Free Gas Cylinders

Although the distribution of cooking gas equipment attracted public attention, officials insist the programme was never simply about giving away cylinders.

Rather, it was conceived as a long-term public health intervention designed to reduce the devastating effects of indoor air pollution, one of the world’s most overlooked environmental health risks.

Speaking during the grand finale, the Mandate Secretary of the Health Services and Environment Secretariat (HSES), Dr. Dolapo Fasawe, explained that the project was born after authorities discovered that many Abuja residents, including those living within the city centre, still depended heavily on firewood for daily cooking.

According to her, prolonged exposure to smoke from firewood contributes significantly to respiratory infections, eye irritation, allergies, burns and environmental pollution.

Instead of merely discouraging residents from using firewood, the Administration decided to provide a practical and affordable alternative.

The result was the Abuja Breathe Clean Air Initiative, supported through funding by IHS Nigeria.

The intervention has now enabled more than 12,500 households to adopt cleaner cooking methods, improving household health, reducing cooking expenses and increasing productivity among small-scale food vendors who previously depended on firewood and charcoal.

To ensure sustained adoption, beneficiaries also received refill vouchers alongside intensive safety training on the proper handling and use of LPG.

Taking the Campaign Across Abuja

Unlike many intervention programmes concentrated in urban centres, Project Breathe Clean Air deliberately reached communities across all six Area Councils of the FCT.

The Etsu Bwari, Dr Ibrahim Yaro (JP) presenting the Gas Cylinder to o e of the beneficiaries and educating his subjects about the significance of the Initiative

Following its launch, the FCTA embarked on extensive community engagement tours covering: Kuduru Ward in Bwari Area Council, Kuchigoro Ward in Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC), Ayaura Ward – Abaji Area Council, Yangoji Ward in Kwali Area Council, Sabon Gari Ward in Gwagwalada Area Council and Jeida Ward in Kuje Area Council.

Traditional rulers, community leaders, healthcare workers and environmental officers were mobilised to educate residents on the dangers of indoor smoke and the economic benefits of switching to LPG before distributions commenced in each council.

The phased implementation ensured that vulnerable households—including women-led families, elderly residents and persons living with disabilities—were prioritised.

Why Women and Children Face the Greatest Risk

Globally, public health experts have consistently identified indoor air pollution as one of the leading environmental causes of disease among women and young children.

In many Nigerian homes, women spend several hours daily preparing meals over firewood stoves, often carrying babies on their backs while cooking.

The smoke produced from burning wood contains dangerous pollutants, including fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide, which penetrate deep into the lungs.

Medical experts warn that continuous exposure increases the risks of chronic respiratory diseases, pneumonia, asthma, cataracts and cardiovascular complications. For pregnant women, the dangers are even greater.

Research has linked prolonged exposure to firewood smoke with pregnancy complications such as low birth weight, premature delivery and increased risk of stillbirth due to reduced oxygen supply to the unborn child.

Children under five remain especially vulnerable because their lungs are still developing. Regular inhalation of smoke significantly increases their susceptibility to pneumonia, acute respiratory infections and impaired lung development.

These health concerns formed one of the strongest justifications for the Abuja clean cooking initiative.

Representing the Minister of State for the FCT, Dr. Mariya Mahmoud, at the grand finale, Special Adviser Majeed Adamu noted that indoor air pollution disproportionately affects women and children because they spend more time around household cooking areas.

Environmental Gains Beyond the Kitchen

Cross-session of community leaders present at the event.

The benefits extend far beyond improved household health. Nigeria loses thousands of hectares of forest annually to fuelwood harvesting, with increasing pressure on surrounding forests supplying urban centres.

Every household that transitions from firewood to LPG reduces demand for indiscriminate tree felling, helping conserve biodiversity, improve air quality and mitigate climate change.

Reduced dependence on charcoal also lowers carbon emissions and contributes to national environmental sustainability goals.

Officials believe that if replicated nationwide, clean cooking initiatives could substantially reduce deforestation while supporting Nigeria’s commitments toward climate action.

Economic Relief for Families

The programme also addresses a growing economic challenge.

According to the FCTA, many low-income households spend approximately ₦1,500 daily purchasing firewood.

In comparison, an LPG refill costing around ₦4,000 can last an average family for more than a month, depending on usage.

Beyond reducing cooking costs, LPG enables faster meal preparation, allowing women and small-scale food vendors to devote more time to income-generating activities.

The provision of refill vouchers further cushions beneficiaries during the transition period, encouraging continued use of clean cooking energy rather than a return to firewood.

We Are Expanding Social Investment in Nigeria – Dapo Otunla IHS Nigeria 

For IHS Nigeria, the initiative forms part of a broader sustainability agenda.

Representing the Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of IHS Nigeria, Mohamad Darwish, the company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Services Officer, Dapo Otunla, described the project as a practical demonstration of the company’s commitment to environmental sustainability and community development.

He disclosed that IHS fulfilled its commitment by donating 10,000 LPG cylinders in phases across the FCT while simultaneously enrolling 2,000 beneficiaries into its “Clinic Without Walls” health insurance scheme.

According to him, the project aligns with IHS Nigeria’s environmental and community sustainability pillars by reducing dependence on biomass fuels, improving public health and enhancing the quality of life of vulnerable households.

Otunla praised the collaboration between the FCTA, traditional institutions and community leaders, describing it as a model partnership capable of delivering measurable improvements in health, environmental protection and community resilience.

Communities Welcome a Breath of Fresh Air

For many beneficiaries, the intervention represents far more than access to a modern cooking appliance.

Sarah Monday, one of the beneficiaries from Bwari Area Council, expressed excitement after receiving her first gas cylinder.

According to her, the support would make cooking easier and safer for her family.

She also commended organisers for providing practical demonstrations on the safe handling and use of LPG, promising to permanently adopt clean cooking methods.

Across the various Area Councils visited during the programme, similar sentiments echoed among beneficiaries, many of whom described the intervention as life-changing.

Looking Beyond the Grand Finale

Although the official distribution exercise has ended, health officials insist that the campaign itself is only beginning.

The FCTA hopes the success of Project Breathe Clean Air–Abuja will provide the foundation for future policies promoting wider adoption of clean cooking energy throughout the Federal Capital Territory.

If sustained through supportive regulations, expanded LPG access and continued public education, the initiative could significantly reduce preventable illnesses, ease pressure on Nigeria’s forests, lower household energy costs and improve the quality of life for thousands more families.

For Abuja, the smoke rising from traditional kitchens is gradually giving way to a cleaner future—one gas flame, one healthier family and one protected forest at a time.

   

About author
Time Nigeria is a modern and general interest Magazine with its Headquarters in Abuja. The Magazine has a remarkable difference in editorial philosophy and goals, it adheres strictly to the ethics of Journalism by using the finest ethos of the profession to promote peace among citizens; identifying and harnessing the nation’s vast resources; celebrating achievements of government agencies, individuals, groups and corporate organizations and above all, repositioning Nigeria for the needed growth and development. Time Nigeria gives emphasis to places and issues that have not been given adequate attention by others. The Magazine is national in outlook and is currently being read and patronized both in print and on our vibrant and active online platform (www.timenigeria.com).
Articles
Related posts
All The NewsCover StoryNewsPolitics

Musa Tsoken Congratulates Kalu on Daily Times’ Lawmaker of the Year Award

1 Mins read
The National Coordinator of the Asiwaju Again Renewed Hope Support Initiative 2027 and National President of the APC Initiative for Good Governance…
Abuja FileDevelopmentEconomyEnergyFinanceInside LagosOpinionPerspective

The Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: Why Capital Still Fails to Become Infrastructure

6 Mins read
  By Chidi Nwafor  In October 2023, a Gulf sovereign wealth fund quietly closed a $2 billion allocation to global infrastructure, earmarked in part for emerging-market energy and transport assets. The announcement drew the usual applause: another sign, commentators said, that institutional capital was finally waking up to the infrastructure opportunity in the Global South. Eighteen months later, less than a tenth of that allocation had actually left the fund’s balance sheet. Not because the mandate had changed. Not because the fund had lost appetite. According to two people familiar with the portfolio, the constraint was simpler and more uncomfortable: there were not enough investable projects to put the money into. This is not a story about a reluctant investor. It is a story about capital that wants to move, cannot find enough places willing and able to receive it in a form it can underwrite, and quietly waits instead. Multiply that fund by the hundreds of pension schemes, sovereign wealth vehicles, commercial banks and infrastructure funds now carrying dedicated allocations for emerging-market infrastructure, and a pattern emerges that rarely makes it into a headline: the world is not short of capital for infrastructure. It has capital in historic abundance, sitting adjacent to a historic infrastructure gap, unable to cross the distance between the two. The Comfortable Explanation  The explanation on offer at every major infrastructure summit is a familiar one. Global infrastructure investment needs run into the tens of trillions of dollars over the coming decade; committed capital falls well short; therefore, the problem is one of insufficient funding, and the solution is more of it: more pledges, more blended-finance facilities, more climate funds, more multilateral capital increases. It is a comfortable explanation because it assigns responsibility clearly to governments who under-fund, institutions who under-commit, and it offers a clean remedy: raise more. It is also, on close inspection, not what the evidence shows. Pension funds globally hold trillions in assets under management with explicit infrastructure allocations that remain structurally underweight, not because trustees have rejected the asset class but because deal flow meeting their risk and governance thresholds has not materialised at the pace their mandates assume. Sovereign wealth funds report the same pattern. Commercial banks with dedicated project finance desks describe pipelines that look full at the term-sheet stage and thin dramatically by financial close. Development finance institutions, whose entire purpose is to absorb risk that commercial capital will not, routinely report that their binding constraint is not capital adequacy but the volume of bankable transactions their teams can originate and structure in a given year. None of this fits the scarcity narrative. All of it fits a different one. Availability Is Not Deployability  Capital availability and capital deployability are not the same condition, and the conflation of the two is doing real damage to how the world thinks about the infrastructure gap. Availability asks whether money exists somewhere with a mandate that could, in principle, be pointed at infrastructure. Deployability asks something much narrower and much harder: whether a specific project, at a specific moment, has been engineered, structured, documented and de-risked to the point where an investment committee can approve it without exception. The first condition is met, overwhelmingly, across nearly every category of capital that matters to infrastructure. The second is met by only a small fraction of the projects competing for it. The result is a market that looks, from the outside, like a financing gap, and functions, from the inside, like a conversion problem: an abundance of capital on one side, an abundance of infrastructure need on the other, and an underbuilt set of mechanisms in between capable of turning one into the other at any meaningful scale. Where the Conversion Breaks  The break does not happen at the ends of the process. It happens in the middle, in the unglamorous sequence of work that turns a plausible concept into an instrument a fiduciary can sign. A promising transmission project needs a feasibility study rigorous enough to survive institutional scrutiny rather than optimistic enough to attract early interest. It needs offtake arrangements that hold up under real counterparty and currency risk, not the counterparty risk assumed in a base case. It needs environmental and social documentation calibrated to the standards of the institutions being asked to fund it, not the standards of the jurisdiction hosting it. It needs a legal and commercial structure that allocates risk in ways a commercial lender, not only a development financier, will accept. It needs a sponsor capable of executing what has been proposed, not merely capable of proposing it. Each of these is ordinary project finance discipline. None of it is exotic, and in mature infrastructure markets it happens as a matter of course, absorbed into systems built over decades: specialist advisers, standard-form contracts, established procurement norms, deep pools of transaction expertise. What is missing in the markets where the infrastructure gap is largest is not the standard itself but the machinery that meets it. Projects arrive at investment committees with ambition intact and preparation incomplete, and that gap is treated, again and again, as an individual project’s failure rather than what it actually is: a structural absence in the systems responsible for producing investable transactions at scale. The Missing Middle  This is the Missing Middle of Infrastructure Finance: the institutional architecture that sits between capital that wants to move and infrastructure that needs building, and whose incompleteness explains far more of the global infrastructure gap than any shortfall in committed funds. It consists of project preparation facilities able to fund feasibility and structuring work before commercial viability has been proven. Transaction advisers capable of building deals that satisfy development mandates and commercial return thresholds at once, rather than treating the two as separate constituencies to be managed sequentially. Risk-sharing and guarantee instruments that convert political, regulatory and currency risk into something a commercial balance sheet can underwrite. Aggregation platforms that bundle smaller, individually sub-scale projects into portfolios large enough to justify institutional transaction costs. Standardised documentation that reduces the bespoke legal cost of every new deal. And coordination across ministries, regulators and financiers robust enough that a technically sound project does not die in bureaucratic sequencing after the money has already been found. None of these are new ideas in isolation. What is missing is their assembly into a coherent system, deliberately funded and institutionally accountable, rather than scattered across donor-funded pilots that end when the grant does. The African Dimension  Africa makes this dynamic unusually visible, and consequently offers an unusually clear opportunity to correct it. The continent’s infrastructure financing need, by any measure, is vast. Less understood is that the shortfall is disproportionately one of preparation rather than capital. Nigerian gas-to-power, off-grid solar and mini-grid developers have each demonstrated that individual projects can clear the bankability bar; what has not emerged is systemic pipeline scale, a steady stream of comparably prepared projects large enough to absorb the capital already circling the sector. The pattern repeats, with local variation, from grid infrastructure in East Africa to transport corridors in West Africa. Interested capital is rarely the scarce input. Investment-ready projects are. The Global Comparison  Mature markets solved this problem gradually and mostly invisibly, through decades of institution-building that predates the current infrastructure conversation: specialist project finance units inside banks, standardised PPP frameworks, established regulatory playbooks, deep benches of transaction lawyers and engineers who move between deals rather than between one-off assignments. Emerging and frontier markets are not being asked to meet a lower standard. They are being asked to meet the same standard without having built the same machinery, and then being told, when deals fail to close, that the problem is insufficient funding….
Cover StoryNewsSports

Union Bank, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard, Others Back 5th Cycling Lagos

2 Mins read
Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, AIICO Multishield, Checkers Custard and other corporate organisations have thrown their weight behind the 5th Cycling Lagos,…
Stay on the loop!

Subscribe to our latest news.

Leave a Reply

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com